Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33228650›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Defining culturally safe primary care for people who use substances: a participatory concept mapping study.

Karen Urbanoski, Bernadette Pauly, Dakota Inglis, Fred Cameron, Troy Haddad, Jack Phillips, Paige Phillips, Conor Rosen, Grant Schlotter, Elizabeth Hartney and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karen UrbanoskiTechnology Enterprise Facility, Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada. urbanosk@uvic.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7017-3546
Bernadette PaulyTechnology Enterprise Facility, Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Dakota InglisTechnology Enterprise Facility, Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Fred CameronSOLID Outreach Society, 1056 N Park St, Victoria, BC, V8T 1C6, Canada.
Troy HaddadSOLID Outreach Society, 1056 N Park St, Victoria, BC, V8T 1C6, Canada.
Jack PhillipsSOLID Outreach Society, 1056 N Park St, Victoria, BC, V8T 1C6, Canada.
Paige PhillipsSOLID Outreach Society, 1056 N Park St, Victoria, BC, V8T 1C6, Canada.
Conor RosenUmbrella Society for Addictions and Mental Health, 415 Dunedin St #8, Victoria, BC, V8T 5G8, Canada.
Grant SchlotterSOLID Outreach Society, 1056 N Park St, Victoria, BC, V8T 1C6, Canada.
Elizabeth HartneyCentre for Health Leadership and Research, Royal Roads University, 2005 Sooke Road, Victoria, BC, V9B 5Y2, Canada.
Bruce WallaceTechnology Enterprise Facility, Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
University of Victoria · CARoyal Roads University · CA

Funding

CIHR PEG-151800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople who use substances experience high levels of substance-related stigma, both within and outside of health care settings, which can prevent people from help-seeking and contribute further to health inequities. Recognizing and respecting how political, social, economic, and historical conditions influence health and health care, cultural safety, with origins in addressing Indigenous racism, is a potential strategy for mitigating stigma and marginalization in health care. Using a participatory research approach, we applied the concept of cultural safety to develop a model of safe primary care from the perspective of people who use substances.

methodsPeople who use or used substances were involved in all phases of the research and led data collection. Study participants (n = 75) were 42.5 years old on average; half identified as female and one quarter as Indigenous. All were currently using or had previous experience with substances (alcohol and/or other drugs) and were recruited through two local peer-run support agencies. Concept mapping with hierarchical cluster analysis was used to develop the model of safe primary care, with data collected over three rounds of focus groups.

resultsParticipants identified 73 unique statements to complete the focus prompt: "I would feel safe going to the doctor if …" The final model consisted of 8 clusters that cover a wide range of topics, from being treated with respect and not being red-flagged for substance use, to preserving confidentiality, advocacy for good care and systems change, and appropriate accommodations for anxiety and the effects of poverty and criminalization.

conclusionsDeveloping a definition of safe care (from the patient perspective) is the necessary first step in creating space for positive interactions and, in turn, improve care processes. This model provides numerous concrete suggestions for providers, as well as serving as starting point for the development of interventions designed to foster system change.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersPrimary Health CareAdultDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansCanadaCommunity based participatory researchConcept mappingCultural safetyPrimary careStigmaSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID33228650
PMCPMC7685616
OpenAlexW3110501119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.