Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33228625›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Targeting mailed nicotine patch distribution interventions to rural regions of Canada: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

John A Cunningham, Michael Chaiton, Scott T Leatherdale, Alexandra Godinho, Christina Schell

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04606797 (Targeting Mailed Nicotine Patch Distribution Interventions to Rural Regions of Canada), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04606797 phase4completednot on this map

Targeting Mailed Nicotine Patch Distribution Interventions to Rural Regions of Canada: Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthRan2020 to 2022Enrolled498ConditionsTobacco Use CessationArmsNicotine patch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

John A CunninghamCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S1, Canada. john.cunningham@camh.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0668-5982
Michael ChaitonCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S1, Canada.
Scott T LeatherdaleSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Alexandra GodinhoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S1, Canada.
Christina SchellCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S1, Canada.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAAustralian National University · AUUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

CIHR 425862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuitting smoking is the most effective way of reducing the risk of cancer among smokers. One way of helping people stop smoking is to provide them with free Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT), such as when NRT is sent to people by postal mail as part of a mass distribution initiative. Our previous research indicated that there may be a substantial impact on increasing quit rates of a mailed NRT intervention in rural areas. The current research seeks to confirm this finding and to understand the social determinants of health driving these anticipated large effects. METHODS/

designTelephone numbers will be randomly selected from across rural regions of Canada in order to recruit adult smokers interested in completing a smoking survey and willing to be interviewed again in 6 months. The survey will ask participants about their smoking history, demographic characteristics, and a hypothetical question: would they be interested in receiving nicotine patches if they were provided to them free of charge? Half of the smokers interested in receiving nicotine patches will be selected by chance and offered the NRT package. The other half of smokers will not be offered the nicotine patches. In addition, the municipality where each participant lives will be identified and, once the relevant general population data becomes available, attempts will be made to link participant data to relevant municipal characteristics (e.g., smoking rates, availability of health services). Characteristics of the participants and the municipalities in which they live will be used to explain why the nicotine patch intervention may have a larger impact in some rural regions compared to others. DISCUSSION: The findings from the proposed RCT are timely and of high relevance as the distribution of nicotine patches has substantial potential to combat the public health problem of cigarette related cancer, other diseases, and premature death from tobacco use. Targeting such tobacco cessation initiatives to rural regions may substantially increase the impact of this intervention, helping to optimize the use of limited prevention resources while aiming to save the maximum number of lives. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04606797 , October, 27, 2020.

Indexed as

Postal ServiceRural PopulationTobacco Use Cessation DevicesAdultCanadaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSmoking CessationTobacco SmokingMass distributionNicotine patchesNRTRuralSmokingTobacco cessation

Identifiers

PMID33228625
PMCPMC7684960
OpenAlexW3110214915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.