ArticleBMC public health2020
Challenges in public health and epidemiology research in humanitarian settings: experiences from the field.
Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Conflict-associated wounds and burns infected with GLASS pathogens in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- The MERGE Dataset: A Harmonized Global Resource for Climate Disaster Impacts and Human Vulnerability.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Exposure to intimate partner violence against women and its association with experiences and perpetration of violence among children and youth in refugee camps in Ethiopia.Conflict and health · 2026Article
- The humanitarian AI paradox: Key opportunities, challenges and research needs for the use of AI in humanitarian mental health response.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Childhood exposure to intimate partner violence against women and its association with violence against children in refugee settlements in Uganda.Conflict and health · 2025Article
- Managing Post-Disaster Primary Health Care: Experiences of Public Health Professionals After the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake.International journal of public health · 2025Article
- The impacts of war on health, human rights, and the environment-an overview.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- A Scoping Review of Factors Associated with HIV Acquisition in the Context of Humanitarian Crises.AIDS and behavior · 2024Article
- Rapid surveys on violence against women in crisis contexts: decision-making guidance based on the UN Women Rapid Gender Assessment surveys on violence against women during COVID-19.The Lancet. Global health · 2024Review
- Advancing Refugee Health Data Management: The Implementation of ICD-11 in UNRWA's Primary Care System.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- One Health research ethics review processes in African countries: Challenges and opportunities.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Implementing and evaluating integrated care models for non-communicable diseases in fragile and humanitarian settings.Journal of migration and health · 2024Article
- Experiences of operating room nurses in disaster preparedness of a great disaster in Iran: a qualitative study.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Article
- The Integration of Social Science for Community Engagement in the Humanitarian Fields of Conflicts and Disasters: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Investigating outbreaks of initially unknown aetiology in complex settings: findings and recommendations from 10 case studies.International health · 2023Review
- The impact of natural disasters on healthcare and surgical services in low- and middle-income countries.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Exploring the feasibility of establishing a core set of sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health indicators in humanitarian settings: results from a multi-methods assessment in Jordan.Reproductive health · 2023Article
- Scaling up a monitoring and evaluation framework for sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health services and outcomes in humanitarian settings: A global initiative.Dialogues in health · 2022Article
- Measurement of perceived needs in humanitarian contexts using the HESPER scale: a scoping study with reflections on the collaboration between researchers and humanitarian actors.Conflict and health · 2022Article
- Civil war and death in Yemen: Analysis of SMART survey and ACLED data, 2012-2019.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHumanitarian settings often present unique scientific challenges and conditions that distinguish them from standard research settings. While a number of these challenges are faced in both standard settings and humanitarian settings, factors unique to humanitarian settings such as inaccessibility and time sensitivities further exacerbate the effects of these challenges. This analysis focuses on experiences in post-disaster contexts such as Indonesia and India following the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami, the Philippines following Typhoon Haiyan in 2013, and Nepal following the 2015 earthquake. DISCUSSION: Particular issues that we faced in undertaking research in post-disaster settings include challenges with uncharted ethical and cultural considerations, non-standardised administrative methods for record keeping, data sharing and dissemination. While these issues are not unique to post-disaster humanitarian settings, the time-sensitive nature of our work exacerbated the effects of these concerns. Relying on local partners and making quick decisions to tackle issues is imperative for navigating both foreseen and unforeseen challenges. While pre-emptive action to address these concerns is the most efficient means to expedite research protocols, adaptability and contingency planning are key components of practical research implementation in dynamic situations.
conclusionsResearch is not always a priority in humanitarian settings, so innovative methods are necessary to conduct meaningful and situationally appropriate research in these venues. By understanding available resources, local culture, and political considerations and working efficiently and decisively, we can begin to jump hurdles associated with epidemiologic research in humanitarian settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.