Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33228543›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Results-based financing to increase uptake of skilled delivery services in The Gambia: using the 'three delays' model to interpret midline evaluation findings.

Laura Ferguson, Rifat Hasan, Chantelle Boudreaux, Hannah Thomas, Mariama Jallow, Günther Fink, Project Implementation Committee (PIC)

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Laura FergusonInstitute on Inequalities in Global Health, University of Southern California, 2001 N Soto St, SSB318H, MC-9239, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA. laura.ferguson@med.usc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8563-734X
Rifat HasanWorld Bank Group, 70, Lodhi Estate, New Delhi, 110003, India.
Chantelle BoudreauxHarvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Hannah ThomasInstitute on Inequalities in Global Health, University of Southern California, 2001 N Soto St, SSB318H, MC-9239, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Mariama JallowCentre for Reproductive Sexual Health, Tanji, Kombo South, West Coast Region, The Gambia.
Günther FinkSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, CH-4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Project Implementation Committee (PIC)
University of Southern California · USHarvard University · USSexual Health Clinic · FISwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHWorld Bank Group · US

Funding

World Bank Group HRITF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelays in accessing skilled delivery services are a major contributor to high maternal mortality in resource-limited settings. In 2015, the government of The Gambia initiated a results-based financing intervention that sought to increase uptake of skilled delivery. We performed a midline evaluation to determine the impact of the intervention and explore causes of delays.

methodsA mixed methods design was used to measure changes in uptake of skilled delivery and explore underlying reasons, with communities randomly assigned to four arms: (1) community-based intervention, (2) facility-based intervention, (3) community- and facility-based intervention, and (4) control. We obtained quantitative data from household surveys conducted at baseline (n = 1423) and midline (n = 1573). Qualitative data came from semi-structured interviews (baseline n = 20; midline n = 20) and focus group discussions (baseline n = 27; midline n = 39) with a range of stakeholders. Multivariable linear regression models were estimated using pooled data from baseline and midline. Qualitative data were recorded, transcribed, translated and thematically analyzed.

resultsNo increase was found in uptake of skilled delivery services between baseline and midline. However, relative to the control group, significant increases in referral to health facilities for delivery were found in areas receiving the community-based intervention (beta = 0.078, p < 0.10) and areas receiving both the community-based and facility-based interventions (beta = 0.198, p < 0.05). There was also an increase in accompaniment to health facilities for delivery in areas receiving only community-based interventions (beta = 0.095, p < 0.05). Transportation to health facilities for delivery increased in areas with both interventions (beta = 0.102, p < 0.05). Qualitative data indicate that delays in the decision to seek institutional delivery usually occurred when women had limited knowledge of delivery indications. Delays in reaching a health facility typically occurred due to transportation-related challenges. Although health workers noted shortages in supplies and equipment, women reported being supported by staff and experiencing minimal delays in receiving skilled delivery care once at the facility.

conclusionsFocusing efforts on informing the decision to seek care and overcoming transportation barriers can reduce delays in care-seeking among pregnant women and facilitate efforts to increase uptake of skilled delivery services through results-based financing mechanisms.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesMaternal MortalityAdolescentAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleFocus GroupsGambiaHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicLinear ModelsMaternal Health ServicesMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPatient Acceptance of Health CareMaternal healthMaternity careResults-based financingThe Gambia

Identifiers

PMID33228543
PMCPMC7686684
OpenAlexW3109356386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.