Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33228242›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Could Training in an Anatomical Model Be Useful to Teach Different Neovagina Surgical Techniques? A Descriptive Study about Knowledge and Experience of Techniques for Neovagina Surgery.

María Luísa Sanchez-Ferrer, Grigoris Grimbizis, Michele Nisolle, Enrique Salmeron-González, Luis Gómez-Pérez, Francisco Sánchez Del Campo, Maribel Acién

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

María Luísa Sanchez-FerrerDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, "Virgen de la Arrixaca" University Clinical Hospital, 30120 El Palmar (Murcia), Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9173-5229
Grigoris GrimbizisFirst Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Michele NisolleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Liège, CHR Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Enrique Salmeron-GonzálezPlastic Surgery and Burns Service, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0630-3227
Luis Gómez-PérezDepartment of Urology, "San Juan" University Clinical Hospital, University Miguel Hernández, 03550 Alicante, Spain.
Francisco Sánchez Del CampoDepartment of Histology and Anatomy, University Miguel Hernández, 03550 Alicante, Spain.
Maribel AciénDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, "San Juan" University Clinical Hospital, University Miguel Hernández, 03550 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6536-453X
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria · ESUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neovagina surgery in patients with vaginal agenesis is rare. No consensus exists regarding the best surgical technique. The aims of the current study were to show a new Thiel-embalmed cadaveric model to teach the surgical steps for different techniques of neovagina surgery and to evaluate opinions of this surgical teaching procedure. Four techniques-modified McIndoe, Vecchietti, Davydov, and vulvoperineal pediculated flaps-were recorded using an external camera and/or laparoscopic vision during their execution in a dissection room on "feminized" male cadavers. To determine the opinion of this teaching model, we designed an anonymous online survey that was available to participants via a computer application. After watching the video, more than 92% of participants agreed that feminized male cadavers were an excellent procedure for teaching these surgical techniques. Before watching this video, the most employed techniques were the McIndoe and Vecchietti procedures. After watching the video, modified McIndoe and vulvoperineal flaps were preferred by participants because they were considered to be easier to perform. It was considered that this model was useful for training neovagina techniques and, moreover, it should be recommended before techniques were performed on a real patient. Further investigation is needed to validate this model.

Indexed as

neovaginasurgical skillsthiel anatomical model

Identifiers

PMID33228242
PMCPMC7699514
OpenAlexW3104823241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.