Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33228143›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Statistical Physics for Medical Diagnostics: Learning, Inference, and Optimization Algorithms.

Abolfazl Ramezanpour, Andrew L Beam, Jonathan H Chen, Alireza Mashaghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abolfazl RamezanpourLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Leiden University, 2333CC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Andrew L BeamDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Jonathan H ChenBiomedical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5101, USA.
Alireza MashaghiLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Leiden University, 2333CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2157-1211

Funding

Predicting Pulmonary and Cardiac Morbidity in Preterm Infants with Deep LearningK01HL141771 · NHLBI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI BEAM, ANDREW L. · 2019 to 2023
$832k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL141771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely believed that cooperation between clinicians and machines may address many of the decisional fragilities intrinsic to current medical practice. However, the realization of this potential will require more precise definitions of disease states as well as their dynamics and interactions. A careful probabilistic examination of symptoms and signs, including the molecular profiles of the relevant biochemical networks, will often be required for building an unbiased and efficient diagnostic approach. Analogous problems have been studied for years by physicists extracting macroscopic states of various physical systems by examining microscopic elements and their interactions. These valuable experiences are now being extended to the medical field. From this perspective, we discuss how recent developments in statistical physics, machine learning and inference algorithms are coming together to improve current medical diagnostic approaches.

Indexed as

diagnostic processdisease progressionstatistical physics

Identifiers

PMID33228143
PMCPMC7699346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.