Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33228114›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2020

Evaluation of a Common Internal Standard Material to Reduce Inter-Laboratory Variation and Ensure the Quality, Safety and Efficacy of Expanded Newborn Screening Results When Using Flow Injection Analysis Tandem Mass Spectrometry with Internal Calibration.

Rachel S Carling, Catharine John, Philippa Goddard, Caroline Griffith, Simon Cowen, Christopher Hopley, Stuart J Moat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel S CarlingBiochemical Sciences, Viapath, Guys & St Thomas' NHSFT, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Catharine JohnBiochemical Sciences, Viapath, Guys & St Thomas' NHSFT, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Philippa GoddardNewborn Screening & Biochemical Genetics, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham B4, UK.
Caroline GriffithSpecialist Laboratory Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
Simon CowenLGC, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LY, UK.
Christopher HopleyLGC, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LY, UK.
Stuart J MoatDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Immunology & Toxicology, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK.
Biochemical Society · GBBirmingham Children's Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2015, the newborn screening (NBS) programmes in England and Wales were expanded to include four additional disorders: Classical Homocystinuria, Isovaleric Acidemia, Glutaric Aciduria Type 1 and Maple Syrup Urine Disease, bringing the total number of analytes quantified to eight: phenylalanine, tyrosine, leucine, methionine, isovalerylcarnitine, glutarylcarnitine, octanoylcarnitine and decanoylcarnitine. Post-implementation, population data monitoring showed that inter-laboratory variation was greater than expected, with 90th centiles varying from 17 to 59%. We evaluated the effect of stable isotope internal standard (IS) used for quantitation on inter-laboratory variation. Four laboratories analysed routine screening samples (

Indexed as

dried blood spotsexpanded screeningflow injection analysis tandem mass spectrometryinter-laboratory variationinternal calibrationisotope dilution

Identifiers

PMID33228114
PMCPMC7712741
OpenAlexW3104942615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.