Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33228004›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Critical Review of Existing MHC I Immunopeptidome Isolation Methods.

Alexandr Kuznetsov, Alice Voronina, Vadim Govorun, Georgij Arapidi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular origin, discovery, validation and application of neoantigens.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Immunoproteomics: The Evolution from Classical Methods to Emerging Techniques.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandr KuznetsovFederal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, 119435 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9026-6934
Alice VoroninaFederal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, 119435 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9540-0549
Vadim GovorunFederal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Georgij ArapidiDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University), 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2323-1859
Federal Medical-Biological Agency · RUMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology · RU

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 075-15-2019-1669Russian Foundation for Basic Research 17-00-00461Russian Science Foundation 20-15-00400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) plays a crucial role in the development of adaptive immune response in vertebrates. MHC molecules are cell surface protein complexes loaded with short peptides and recognized by the T-cell receptors (TCR). Peptides associated with MHC are named immunopeptidome. The MHC I immunopeptidome is produced by the proteasome degradation of intracellular proteins. The knowledge of the immunopeptidome repertoire facilitates the creation of personalized antitumor or antiviral vaccines. A huge number of publications on the immunopeptidome diversity of different human and mouse biological samples-plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and solid tissues, including tumors-appeared in the scientific journals in the last decade. Significant immunopeptidome identification efficiency was achieved by advances in technology: the immunoprecipitation of MHC and mass spectrometry-based approaches. Researchers optimized common strategies to isolate MHC-associated peptides for individual tasks. They published many protocols with differences in the amount and type of biological sample, amount of antibodies, type and amount of insoluble support, methods of post-fractionation and purification, and approaches to LC-MS/MS identification of immunopeptidome. These parameters have a large impact on the final repertoire of isolated immunopeptidome. In this review, we summarize and compare immunopeptidome isolation techniques with an emphasis on the results obtained.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAnimalsAntibodiesChromatography, AffinityHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansPeptidesProteomeAntibodiesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IPeptidesProteomeHLAhuman leukocyte antigenimmunoaffinity chromatographyimmunopeptidomemajor histocompatibility complex class IMHC

Identifiers

PMID33228004
PMCPMC7699222
OpenAlexW3103855410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.