Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33227949›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Phage Therapy: Towards a Successful Clinical Trial.

Andrzej Górski, Jan Borysowski, Ryszard Międzybrodzki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Potential of Bacteriophage Therapy as an Alternative Treatment Approach for Antibiotic-Resistant Infections.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The future of phage therapy in the USA.Trends in molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Eliminating the type I restriction endonuclease fromMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrzej GórskiBacteriophage Laboratory, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences (HIIET PAS), 53-114 Wroclaw, Poland.
Jan BorysowskiDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Transplantation Institute, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-006 Warsaw, Poland.
Ryszard MiędzybrodzkiBacteriophage Laboratory, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences (HIIET PAS), 53-114 Wroclaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While phage therapy carried out as compassionate use (experimental therapy) has recently flourished, providing numerous case reports of supposedly healed patients, clinical trials aiming to formally prove their value in accord with current regulatory requirements have failed. In light of the current issue of increasing antibiotic resistance, the need for a final say regarding the place of phage therapy in modern medicine is evident. We analyze the possible factors that may favor success or lead to the failure of phage therapy: quality of phage preparations, their titer and dosage, as well as external factors that could also contribute to the outcome of phage therapy. Hopefully, better control of these factors may eventually bring about long-awaited positive results.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistanceclinical trialphage therapy

Identifiers

PMID33227949
PMCPMC7699228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.