Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33227905›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants' Physical Activity Levels.

Danica Janicijevic, Olivera M Knezevic, Amador Garcia-Ramos, Danilo Cvetic, Dragan M Mirkov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Danica JanicijevicFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia.
Olivera M KnezevicFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-8924-4420
Amador Garcia-RamosDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain.
Danilo CveticFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia.
Dragan M MirkovFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia.
University of Belgrade · RSUniversidad de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIsokinetic testing has been routinely used to assess the capacities of individual muscle groups. In this study we aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of the force-point (F-v) relationship assessed through the two-point method to discriminate between antagonist muscle groups and males with different physical activity levels.

methodsThe concentric force output of the knee, hip, elbow, and shoulder flexors and extensors of 27 active and 13 non-active men was recorded at 60 and 180°/s to determine the F-v relationship parameters (maximum force [

results

conclusionsThe sensitivity of the two-point method for testing the maximal mechanical capacities was high for the knee, moderate for the hip and shoulder, and low for the elbow joint.

Indexed as

Biophysical PhenomenaExerciseJointsMuscle, SkeletalElbowHumansKneeKnee JointMaleelbowextensorsflexorshipkneeshoulder

Identifiers

PMID33227905
PMCPMC7699145
OpenAlexW3100406812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.