Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33227255›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2021

Effect of COVID-19 on maternal and neonatal services.

Asma Khalil, Peter von Dadelszen, Austin Ugwumadu, Tim Draycott, Laura A Magee

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Regional differences in the quality of maternal and neonatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  4. Indirect impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on pregnancy and childbirth outcomes: A nine-month long experience from a university center in Lombardy.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  5. Antepartum stillbirth rates during the COVID-19 pandemic in Austria: A population-based study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Asma KhalilFetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's Hospital, St George's University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK; Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's Hospital, St George's University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK. Electronic address: akhalil@sgul.ac.uk.
Peter von DadelszenSchool of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Austin UgwumaduFetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's Hospital, St George's University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK.
Tim DraycottThe Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK; North Bristol NHS Trust Department of Women's Health, Westbury on Trym, UK.
Laura A MageeSchool of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsFemaleHumansInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornNepalPregnancyProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Stillbirth

Identifiers

PMID33227255
PMCPMC7833114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.