ReviewThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2021
Clinical trials in critical care: can a Bayesian approach enhance clinical and scientific decision making?
Review in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06409351 (Multi-mOdal Training Program to Promote Physical actIVity After sTrokE), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multi-mOdal Training Program to Promote Physical actIVity After sTrokE: MOTIVATE
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.
- Absence of Evidence of Beneficial Effects of Human Milk-Based Fortifier: A Bayesian Model-Averaged Meta-Analysis.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Pooled it
- Blood Pressure Targets for Adults with Vasodilatory Shock - An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.NEJM evidence · 2025Pooled it
- Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus standard treatment for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a Bayesian meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Non-inferiority and clinical superiority of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors: Systematic analysis of cardiorenal outcome trials in type 2 diabetes.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2022Pooled it
- Target temperature management following cardiac arrest: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Pooled it
- A Research Agenda for Precision Medicine in Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021Guideline
- Between-trial heterogeneity in ARDS research.Intensive care medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Restrictive vs Liberal Transfusion Strategy After Myocardial Infarction: A Post Hoc Analysis of the MINT Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- A Bayesian re-analysis of the DANFLU-1 trial.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Trial
- Impact of neuromuscular block monitoring and reversal on postoperative pulmonary complications in thoracic surgery: a Bayesian analysis of the iPROVE-OLV trial.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Trial
- The effect of high protein dosing in critically ill patients: an exploratory, secondary Bayesian analyses of the EFFORT Protein trial.British journal of anaesthesia · 2024Trial
- Randomized, placebo-controlled study on the effects of intravenous GSK3858279 (anti-CCL17) on a battery of evoked pain tests in healthy participants.Clinical and translational science · 2024Trial
- Minimally Invasive Surgery With Thrombolysis for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation: Bayesian Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Neurology · 2023Trial
- Treating intrusive memories after trauma in healthcare workers: a Bayesian adaptive randomised trial developing an imagery-competing task intervention.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Trial
- Special considerations in randomized trials investigating neonatal surgical treatments.Seminars in perinatology · 2022Trial
- Probabilistic Risk-Benefit Profile of Ticagrelor Monotherapy After Short Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Bayesian Analysis of the ULTIMATE-DAPT Trial.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Methodological Pluralism in Surgical Evidence: from Concept to Practice.Surgery in practice and science · 2026Review
- Reporting of second-generationContemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- Does whole-body hypothermia for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in preterm infants 33 to 35 weeks' gestation reduce death or disability?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of Bayesian external information borrowing and frequentist approaches in underpowered confirmatory trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Recent Bayesian reanalyses of prominent trials in critical illness have generated controversy by contradicting the initial conclusions based on conventional frequentist analyses. Many clinicians might be sceptical that Bayesian analysis, a philosophical and statistical approach that combines prior beliefs with data to generate probabilities, provides more useful information about clinical trials than the frequentist approach. In this Personal View, we introduce clinicians to the rationale, process, and interpretation of Bayesian analysis through a systematic review and reanalysis of interventional trials in critical illness. In the majority of cases, Bayesian and frequentist analyses agreed. In the remainder, Bayesian analysis identified interventions where benefit was probable despite the absence of statistical significance, where interpretation depended substantially on choice of prior distribution, and where benefit was improbable despite statistical significance. Bayesian analysis in critical care medicine can help to distinguish harm from uncertainty and establish the probability of clinically important benefit for clinicians, policy makers, and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.