Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33227100›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2020

Glasgow prognostic score is a better predictor of the long-term survival in patients with gastric cancer, compared to the modified Glasgow prognostic score or high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score.

Noriyuki Hirahara, Takeshi Matsubara, Shunsuke Kaji, Yasunari Kawabata, Ryoji Hyakudomi, Tetsu Yamamoto, Yuki Uchida, Kazunari Ishitobi, Kiyoe Takai, Yoshitsugu Tajima

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noriyuki HiraharaDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.
Takeshi MatsubaraDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.
Shunsuke KajiDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.
Yasunari KawabataDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.
Ryoji HyakudomiDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.
Tetsu YamamotoDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.
Yuki UchidaDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.
Kazunari IshitobiDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.
Kiyoe TakaiDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.
Yoshitsugu TajimaDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.
Shimane University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammation influences cancer progression by increasing catabolism and impairing nutrient absorption. We compared the prognostic ability of three inflammation-based prognostic scoring systems-the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), modified GPS (mGPS), and high-sensitivity mGPS (HS-mGPS)-in gastric cancer patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively examined 434 curatively resected gastric cancer patients to evaluate the prognostic ability of scoring systems for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

resultsOS analysis identified the following independent prognostic factors: GPS model: pathological stage (pStage,

conclusionsGPS most reliably predicts long-term survival of gastric cancer patients.

Indexed as

C-reactive proteingastric cancerglasgow prognostic score (GPS)high-sensitivity mGPS (HS-mGPS)modified GPS (mGPS)

Identifiers

PMID33227100
PMCPMC7665228
OpenAlexW3105026984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.