Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33227032›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Chitosan and cottonseed processing method association on carcass traits and meat quality of feedlot lambs.

Tamires da Silva Magalhães, Edson Mauro Santos, José Esler de Freitas Júnior, Stefanie Alvarenga Santos, Douglas Dos Santos Pina, Luis Gabriel Alves Cirne, Luis Fernando Batista Pinto, Gerson Barreto Mourão, Franklin Delano Dos Santos Soares, Laudí Cunha Leite and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Tamires da Silva MagalhãesDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Edson Mauro SantosDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraiba, Areia, Paraíba, Brazil.
José Esler de Freitas JúniorDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Stefanie Alvarenga SantosDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Douglas Dos Santos PinaDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Luis Gabriel Alves CirneInstitute of Biodiversity and Forestry, Federal University of Western Pará, Santarém, Pará, Brazil.
Luis Fernando Batista PintoDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Gerson Barreto MourãoDepartment of Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Franklin Delano Dos Santos SoaresDepartment of Animal Science, University of Southwestern Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, Brazil.
Laudí Cunha LeiteDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia, Cruz das Almas, Bahia, Brazil.
Henry Daniel Ruiz AlbaDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8916-2238
Manuela Silva Libanio TostoDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Gleidson Giordano Pinto de CarvalhoDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4108-6782
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRSouthwest Bahia State University · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal do Oeste do Pará · BRUniversidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the association of cottonseed processing method with chitosan on carcass traits and meat quality of lambs finished in feedlot. Eighty lambs with an average body weight of 20.6 kg, with 04 months of age, were distributed in a completely randomized design, in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement. The factors were represented by two cottonseed processing method (whole or ground) and two levels of chitosan (0 and 136 mg/kg BW). The association of cottonseed processing method with chitosan in the lamb diet did not affect (P>0.05) carcasses traits. The pH, color, cooking losses, shear force, and proximate composition of meat were also not affected (P>0.05) by the processing method of cottonseed or its association with chitosan in the lamb diets. There was an increase in palmitoleic (c9-C16:1; P = 0.01) and conjugated linoleic (P = 0.02) fatty acids when ground cottonseed was associated with chitosan. Ground cottonseed associated with chitosan increases the concentration of unsaturated fatty acids in the meat of feedlot lambs.

Indexed as

Animal FeedFood HandlingAnimalsBody CompositionBody WeightChitosanCottonseed OilFatty Acids, UnsaturatedHumansMeatRed MeatSheepSheep, DomesticChitosanCottonseed OilFatty Acids, Unsaturated

Identifiers

PMID33227032
PMCPMC7682818
OpenAlexW3109311692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.