Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33227029›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

An integrated view on society readiness and initial reaction to COVID-19: A study across European countries.

Dalibor Petrović, Marijana Petrović, Nataša Bojković, Vladan P Čokić

Expression of concernAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Social Cohesion and Community Resilience during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Northern Romania.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dalibor PetrovićFaculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-5323-1177
Marijana PetrovićFaculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Nataša BojkovićFaculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Vladan P ČokićInstitute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-0362-1449

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the question of society's capability to deal with an acute health crisis is, once again, brought to the forefront. In the core is the need to broaden the perspective on the determinants of a country's ability to cope with the spread of the virus. This paper is about bringing together diverse aspects of readiness and initial reaction to a COVID-19 outbreak. We proposed an integrated evaluation framework which encapsulates six dimensions of readiness and initial reaction. Using a specific multi-level outranking method, we analysed how these dimensions affect the relative positioning of European countries in the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak. The results revealed that the order of countries based on our six-dimensional assessment framework is significantly reminiscent of the actual positioning of countries in terms of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality in the initial phase of the pandemic. Our findings confirm that only when a country's readiness is complemented by an appropriate societal reaction we can expect a less severe outcome. Moreover, our study revealed different patterns of performance between former communist Eastern European and Western European countries.

Indexed as

Global HealthSARS-CoV-2AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19EuropeFemaleGovernment RegulationHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPandemicsPatient Isolation

Identifiers

PMID33227029
PMCPMC7682891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.