Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33226988›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Evaluation of the cell culture based and the mouse brain derived inactivated vaccines against Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in transiently immune-suppressed (IS) mouse model.

Shaikh Terkis Islam Pavel, Hazel Yetiskin, Ahmet Kalkan, Aykut Ozdarendeli

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shaikh Terkis Islam PavelDepartment of Microbiology, Medical Faculty, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7178-0943
Hazel YetiskinDepartment of Microbiology, Medical Faculty, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0813-791X
Ahmet KalkanDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Medical Faculty, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9452-1031
Aykut OzdarendeliDepartment of Microbiology, Medical Faculty, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6950-8545
Erciyes University · TRKaradeniz Technical University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) is a tick-borne virus in the Nairoviridae family within the Bunyavirales order of viruses. Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is the most widespread among tick-borne human viral diseases. It is endemic in many areas of Africa, Asia, the Middle East, in the Balkans, Russia and countries of the former Soviet Union. The confirmed CCHF cases were seen in Spain in 2016 to signify expansion of the virus into new geographical areas. CCHFV causes a viral human disease characterized by sudden onset of fever, headache, abdominal pain, nausea, hypotension, hemorrhage, and hepatic dysfunction with fatality rates up to 30%. Currently, there are no spesific treatments or licensed vaccines available for CCHFV. The absence of a susceptible animal model for CCHFV infection was severely hindered work on the development of vaccines. However, several animal models of CCHFV infection have been recently developed and used to assess vaccine efficacy. In this study, we have used the transiently immune-suppressed (IS) mouse model that MAb-5A3 was used to block IFN-I signaling in immune intact, wild-type mice at the time of CCHFV infection to evaluate the immune response and efficacy of the cell culture based and the mouse brain derived inactivated vaccines against CCHFV. Both vaccine preparations have provided complete protection but the cell culture based vaccine more effectively induced to CCFHV spesific antibodies and T cell responses. This is the first comparison of the cell culture based and the mouse brain derived vaccines for assessing the protective efficacy and the immunogenicity in the IS mouse CCHFV model.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBrainCell Culture TechniquesCell LineChlorocebus aethiopsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHemorrhagic Fever, CrimeanHemorrhagic Fever Virus, Crimean-CongoHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineInterferon-gammaMiceAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralIFNG protein, mouseInterferon-gammaVaccines, InactivatedViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID33226988
PMCPMC7721194
OpenAlexW3107525257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.