Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33226647›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2021

A data-driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time-of-flight weighted positron emission particle tracking.

Tasmia Rahman Tumpa, Shelley N Acuff, Jens Gregor, Sanghyeb Lee, Dongming Hu, Dustin R Osborne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tasmia Rahman TumpaGraduate School of Medicine, The University of Tennessee, 1924 Alcoa Hwy, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA.
Shelley N AcuffGraduate School of Medicine, The University of Tennessee, 1924 Alcoa Hwy, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA.
Jens GregorElectrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Tennessee, 1520 Middle Dr, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Sanghyeb LeeIndependent Consultant, Novato, CA, USA.
Dongming HuIndependent Consultant, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Dustin R OsborneGraduate School of Medicine, The University of Tennessee, 1924 Alcoa Hwy, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA.

Funding

Departmental fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRespiratory motion of patients during positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging affects both image quality and quantitative accuracy. Hardware-based motion estimation, which is the current clinical standard, requires initial setup, maintenance, and calibration of the equipment, and can be associated with patient discomfort. Data-driven techniques are an active area of research with limited exploration into lesion-specific motion estimation. This paper introduces a time-of-flight (TOF)-weighted positron emission particle tracking (PEPT) algorithm that facilitates lesion-specific respiratory motion estimation from raw listmode PET data.

methodsThe TOF-PEPT algorithm was implemented and investigated under different scenarios: (a) a phantom study with a point source and an Anzai band for respiratory motion tracking; (b) a phantom study with a point source only, no Anzai band; (c) two clinical studies with point sources and the Anzai band; (d) two clinical studies with point sources only, no Anzai band; and (e) two clinical studies using lesions/internal regions instead of point sources and no Anzai band. For studies with radioactive point sources, they were placed on patients during PET/CT imaging. The motion tracking was performed using a preselected region of interest (ROI), manually drawn around point sources or lesions on reconstructed images. The extracted motion signals were compared with the Anzai band when applicable. For the purposes of additional comparison, a center-of-mass (COM) algorithm was implemented both with and without the use of TOF information. Using the motion estimate from each method, amplitude-based gating was applied, and gated images were reconstructed.

resultsThe TOF-PEPT algorithm is shown to successfully determine the respiratory motion for both phantom and clinical studies. The derived motion signals correlated well with the Anzai band; correlation coefficients of 0.99 and 0.94-0.97 were obtained for the phantom study and the clinical studies, respectively. TOF-PEPT was found to be 13-38% better correlated with the Anzai results than the COM methods. Maximum Standardized Uptake Values (SUVs) were used to quantitatively compare the reconstructed-gated images. In comparison with the ungated image, a 14-39% increase in the max SUV across several lesion areas and an 8.7% increase in the max SUV on the tracked lesion area were observed in the gated images based on TOF-PEPT. The distinct presence of lesions with reduced blurring effect and generally sharper images were readily apparent in all clinical studies. In addition, max SUVs were found to be 4-10% higher in the TOF-PEPT-based gated images than in those based on Anzai and COM methods.

conclusionA PEPT- based algorithm has been presented for determining movement due to respiratory motion during PET/CT imaging. Gating based on the motion estimate is shown to quantifiably improve the image quality in both a controlled point source phantom study and in clinical data patient studies. The algorithm has the potential to facilitate true motion correction where the reconstruction algorithm can use all data available.

Indexed as

ElectronsMotionPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyRespirationbreathingmotion correctionPETpositron emission particle tracking (PEPT)positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)respiratory gatingrespiratory motiontime-of-flight (TOF)

Identifiers

PMID33226647
PMCPMC7984169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.