Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33226553›Full record

Observational studyClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2021

Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in advanced cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.

D Viñal, L Gutierrez-Sainz, D Martinez, J A Garcia-Cuesta, J Pedregosa, J Villamayor, L Ostios, D Sanchez-Cabrero, O Higuera, A Pinto and 4 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. PILE: a candidate prognostic score in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

D ViñalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain. dvinallozano@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9905-3270
L Gutierrez-SainzDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
D MartinezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
J A Garcia-CuestaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
J PedregosaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
J VillamayorDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
L OstiosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
D Sanchez-CabreroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
O HigueraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
A PintoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
N Rodriguez-SalasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
E EspinosaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
J de CastroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
J FeliuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been extensively studied in cancer patients. However, the performance of NLR as an early marker of efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is still understudied. We studied the utility of NLR at baseline (bNLR), before the second dose of immunotherapy (NLR2) and the NLR trend for predicting efficacy outcomes.

methodsWe included all patients with advanced cancer treated with ICI from June 2013 to April 2019 at La Paz University Hospital, Madrid (Spain). We examined bNLR, NLR2 and NLR trend and explored the association with progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months, median PFS and overall survival (OS).

resultsWe included 211 patients. PFS and OS were significantly longer in the low bNLR group than in the high bNLR group [HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.60-0.84) and HR: 0.66 (95% CI 0.55-0.79), respectively]. Regarding NLR2, patients with low NLR2 had significantly longer PFS and OS than patients with high NLR2 [HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.57-0.79) and HR: 0.60 (95% CI 0.50-0.72), respectively]. Finally, for NLR trend, PFS and OS for patients with NLR trend < 1 were significantly longer than those patients with NLR trend ≥ 1 [HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.43-0.82) and HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.44-0.90), respectively]. At the multivariate analysis for PFS and OS, bNLR, NLR2 and NLR trend were all independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS.

conclusionsbNLR, NLR2 and NLR trends are independent prognostic factors for survival in patients on immunotherapy. The dynamics of NLR in patients on immunotherapy is a promising marker that needs further investigation.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyLymphocytesNeutrophilsAgedFemaleHumansLeukocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeImmunotherapyLymphocytesNeoplasmsNeutrophils

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.