Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33226444›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2021

Consensus of multiple national guidelines: agreed strategies for initial stone management during COVID-19.

B Heijkoop, E Galiabovitch, N York, D Webb

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. COVID19: the response of the urologist.World journal of urology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

B HeijkoopAustin Health, The University of Adelaide, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia. bridgetcheijkoop@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6348-5445
E GaliabovitchAustin Health, The University of Adelaide, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
N YorkAuckland Regional Urology Service, Auckland, New Zealand.
D WebbAustin Health, The University of Adelaide, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Austin Health · AUAuckland District Health Board · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo review the existing available information regarding urolithiasis management and the impact of COVID-19 on this, and propose recommendations for management of emergency urolithiasis presentations in the COVID-19 era.

methodsReview of published guidelines produced by Urological Governing Bodies, followed by the literature review regarding urolithiasis management during the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsConsistent recommendations across guidelines and literature were that urolithiasis with concurrent sepsis or renal failure remains a urological emergency warranting urgent intervention within the pandemic environment. Ureteric stenting and percutaneous nephrostomy are considered equivalent for decompression in this setting, with both ideally to be performed under local anaesthesia where possible to spare ventilators and reduce aerosol-generating procedures. Greater utilization of medical expulsive therapy and dissolution chemolysis may occur during the pandemic, and longer indwelling stent times may be accepted while definite stone clearance is deferred.

conclusionsUrolithiasis will continue to be a source of emergency presentations requiring urgent intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it is possible to limit these interventions to decompression of the collecting system in the setting of concurrent obstruction or infection, performed under local anaesthesia to limit use of resources and minimise aerosol-generating procedures, with deferral of definitive management.

Indexed as

COVID-19Emergency Medical ServicesNephrostomy, PercutaneousPractice Patterns, Physicians'UrolithiasisHumansInfection ControlOrganizational InnovationPractice Guidelines as TopicSARS-CoV-2CoronavirusCOVID-19PandemicUrolithiasisUrology

Identifiers

PMID33226444
PMCPMC7681178
OpenAlexW3110354990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.