Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33226351›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Internet Use in Old Age: Results of a German Population-Representative Survey.

Janine Quittschalle, Janine Stein, Melanie Luppa, Alexander Pabst, Margrit Löbner, Hans-Helmut Koenig, Steffi G Riedel-Heller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
26.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janine QuittschalleInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), University of Germany, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3242-3596
Janine SteinInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), University of Germany, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2982-9747
Melanie LuppaInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), University of Germany, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3927-6728
Alexander PabstInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), University of Germany, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0432-5681
Margrit LöbnerInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), University of Germany, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5984-8127
Hans-Helmut KoenigDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5711-6862
Steffi G Riedel-HellerInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), University of Germany, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4321-6090
Leipzig University · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe internet has the potential to foster healthy lifestyles and to support chronic disease management. Older adults could benefit from using the internet and other information and communication technology to access health-related information and interventions available online.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate factors influencing internet use in older and oldest age groups and to determine the frequency of internet use for health-related purposes.

methodsUsing data from a nationally representative telephone survey of older adults aged 75 years and over, a sample of 999 people was assessed using structured clinical interviews. Descriptive and binary logistic regression analyses were performed.

resultsOverall, 42.6% (418/999) of participants used the internet. Among those, 55.7% (233/417) searched the internet for health-related information. Regression analyses revealed that internet use was significantly associated with younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.92; P<.001), male gender (OR 2.84, 95% CI 2.02-4.00; P<.001), higher education levels (OR 6.69, 95% CI 4.48-9.99; P<.001), a wider social network (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07; P=.01), higher health-related quality of life (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.03; P=.006), lower levels of depressive symptoms (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-0.99; P=.04), and higher rates of chronic illness (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.21; P<.004).

conclusionsThis study provides population-representative data on internet use in old age in Germany. People in the older and oldest age groups participate in online activities. Understanding the factors that are associated with older adults internet use can contribute to developing tailored interventions and eHealth (electronic health) services to improve well-being in older adults.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleGermanyHumansInternet UseMaleQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineeHealthepidemiologyhealth servicesinternet useold age

Identifiers

PMID33226351
PMCPMC7685698
OpenAlexW3047539996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.