Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33226186›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2021

Blood pressure variability and outcome in acute severe stroke: A post hoc analysis of CHASE-A randomized controlled trial.

Jingjing Zhao, Fang Yuan, Feng Fu, Yi Liu, Changhu Xue, Kangjun Wang, Xiangjun Yuan, Dingan Li, Qiuwu Liu, Wei Zhang and 14 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Hypertension management in elderly with severe intracerebral hemorrhage.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2021
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Jingjing ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Fang YuanDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Feng FuDepartment of Neurology, 215 Hospital of Shaanxi NI, Xianyang, China.
Yi LiuDepartment of Neurology, Ankang Central Hospital, Ankang, China.
Changhu XueDepartment of Neurology, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China.
Kangjun WangDepartment of Neurology, Hanzhong Central Hospital, Hanzhong, China.
Xiangjun YuanDepartment of Neurology, Weinan Central Hospital, Weinan, China.
Dingan LiDepartment of Neurology, Hanzhong Central Hospital, Hanzhong, China.
Qiuwu LiuDepartment of Neurology, Xi'an 141 Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yi JiaDepartment of Neurology, Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Jianbo HeDepartment of Neurology, Xi'an XD Group Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Jun ZhouDepartment of Neurology, Shangluo Central Hospital, Shangluo, China.
Xiaocheng WangDepartment of Neurology, Yulin No. 2 Central Hospital, Yulin, China.
Hua LvDepartment of Neurology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Kang HuoDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Zhuanhui LiDepartment of Neurology, 521 Hospital of NORINCO Group, Xi'an, China.
Bei ZhangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Chengkai WangDepartment of Neurology, Tongchuan People's Hospital, Tongchuan, China.
Li LiDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Hongzeng LiDepartment of Neurology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Fang YangDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Wen JiangDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0612-2917
CHASE Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influence of blood pressure variability (BPV) on outcomes in patients with severe stroke is still largely unsettled. Using the data of CHASE trial, the authors calculated the BPV during the acute phase and subacute phase of severe stroke, respectively. The primary outcome was to investigate the relationship between BPV and 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≥ 3. The BPV was assessed by eight measurements including standard deviation (SD), mean, maximum, minimum, coefficient of variation (CV), successive variation (SV), functional successive variation (FSV), and average real variability (ARV). Then, the SD of SBP was divided into quintiles and compared the quintile using logistic regression in three models. The acute phase included 442 patients, and the subacute phase included 390 patients. After adjustment, six measurements of BPV during the subacute phase rather than acute phase were strongly correlated with outcomes including minimum (odds ratio [OR]: 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-0.99, p = .037), SD (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03-1.17, p = .007), CV (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03-1.23, p = .012), ARV (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.05-1.20, p < .001), SV (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04-1.15, p = .001), and FSV (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.19, p = .001). In the logistic regression, the highest fifth of SD of SBP predicted poor outcome in all three models. In conclusion, the increased BPV was strongly correlated with poor outcomes in the subacute phase of severe stroke, and the magnitude of association was progressively increased when the SD of BP was above 12.

Indexed as

HypertensionStrokeBlood PressureHumansLogistic ModelsOdds Ratioblood pressure variabilitycritical careoutcomesevere stroke

Identifiers

PMID33226186
PMCPMC8029725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.