Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33226021›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2020

Low-intensity Blast Wave Model for Preclinical Assessment of Closed-head Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Rodents.

Aric F Logsdon, Brandon P Lucke-Wold, Ryan C Turner, Sean M Collins, Evan L Reeder, Jason D Huber, Charles L Rosen, Matthew J Robson, Florian Plattner

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Modeling Highly Repetitive Low-level Blast Exposure in Mice.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Altered Serotonin 2A (5-HTFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Aric F Logsdon *Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs; Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington.
Brandon P Lucke-Wold *Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida.
Ryan C Turner *Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University.
Sean M CollinsDivision of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Cincinnati.
Evan L ReederDivision of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Cincinnati.
Jason D HuberDepartment of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University.
Charles L RosenCentral Illinois Neuro Health Sciences, Bloomington, IL.
Matthew J Robson *Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Cincinnati; matthew.robson@uc.edu.
Florian Plattner *Neuro-research, Dallas, TX; plattner@neuro-research.com.
University of Cincinnati · USWest Virginia University · USCentral Illinois Neuroscience Foundation · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Therapeutic use of bryostatin-1 to extend tPA time window following MCAOR01NS099918 · NINDS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI HUBER, JASON D · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a large-scale public health problem. Mild TBI is the most prevalent form of neurotrauma and accounts for a large number of medical visits in the United States. There are currently no FDA-approved treatments available for TBI. The increased incidence of military-related, blast-induced TBI further accentuates the urgent need for effective TBI treatments. Therefore, new preclinical TBI animal models that recapitulate aspects of human blast-related TBI will greatly advance the research efforts into the neurobiological and pathophysiological processes underlying mild to moderate TBI as well as the development of novel therapeutic strategies for TBI. Here we present a reliable, reproducible model for the investigation of the molecular, cellular, and behavioral effects of mild to moderate blast-induced TBI. We describe a step-by-step protocol for closed-head, blast-induced mild TBI in rodents using a bench-top setup consisting of a gas-driven shock tube equipped with piezoelectric pressure sensors to ensure consistent test conditions. The benefits of the setup that we have established are its relative low-cost, ease of installation, ease of use and high-throughput capacity. Further advantages of this non-invasive TBI model include the scalability of the blast peak overpressure and the generation of controlled reproducible outcomes. The reproducibility and relevance of this TBI model has been evaluated in a number of downstream applications, including neurobiological, neuropathological, neurophysiological and behavioral analyses, supporting the use of this model for the characterization of processes underlying the etiology of mild to moderate TBI.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBlast InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticDisease Models, AnimalExplosionsHumansMaleMice, Inbred C57BLPressureReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID33226021
PMCPMC8179023
OpenAlexW3098355031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.