ArticleRevista espanola de salud publica2020
[Nursing mothers satisfaction with the promotion of breastfeeding and professionals adherence to the recommendations. Multi-center study.]
Article in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors associated with maternal well-being during childbirth among postpartum women in Minas Gerais.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative or clinical practice guideline implementation programs have a positive impact on the promotion of breastfeeding (BF). There are knowledge gaps regarding the perceptions of new mothers towards these initiatives, and their degree of satisfaction. Our objective was to describe the satisfaction of BF mothers and adherence to the recommendations of the "Breastfeeding" guide from the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO).
methodsBetween 2018-2019, in 9 Spanish hospitals that implemented the guide, 2,397 nursing mothers were surveyed who met inclusion criteria. A self-administered survey was designed with sociodemographic data, mother-child, BF promotion interventions carried out and degree of satisfaction. Descriptive and bivariate analysis was performed.
resultsThe recommendations for skin-to-skin contact, help in breastfeeding, observation of a breastfeeding session and resolution of doubts presented adhesions >84%. Information about support groups, rooming-in and recognize signs of baby satisfaction obtained adhesions <40%. The exclusive BF rate at discharge was 77.5%. The mean satisfaction with skin-to-skin contact and the percentage of satisfaction at discharge were 5.8 and 96.8% respectively. The differences were significant between the degree of satisfaction and the educational level, age, work situation, type of delivery and type of hospital (p<0.05).
conclusionsAccording to puerperal women, adherence to the recommendations of the Clinical Practice Guide is good for most interventions and the degree of satisfaction is high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33226012PMC11582965What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.