Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33225972›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

One Plus One Equals Two-will that do? A trial protocol for a Swedish multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate a clinical practice to reduce severe perineal trauma {1}.

M Edqvist, H G Dahlen, C Häggsgård, H Tern, K Ängeby, G Tegerstedt, P Teleman, G Ajne, C Rubertsson

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03770962 (One Plus One Equals Two - Will That do? A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Collegial Midwifery Practice to Prevent Perineal Trauma), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03770962 nacompletednot on this map

One Plus One Equals Two - Will That do? A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Collegial Midwifery Practice to Prevent Perineal Trauma

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2018 to 2021Enrolled3,058ConditionsSphincter (Anal), Perineal Rupture, Obstetric, Perineal Tear, Pelvic Floor DisordersArmsTwo midwives
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M EdqvistDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. malin.edqvist@med.lu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0968-6534
H G DahlenSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4450-3078
C HäggsgårdDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
H TernDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
K ÄngebyCentre for Clinical Research and Education, Region Värmland, Karlstad, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7729-7912
G TegerstedtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
P TelemanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
G AjneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
C RubertssonDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7416-6335
Lund University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEDalarna University · SEWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

FORTE 2018-01192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere perineal trauma sustained during childbirth is a serious complication since it can lead to both short- and long-term consequences for women. Some of the methods used to prevent perineal injuries have been evaluated in clinical trials, but there are still gaps in the evidence. A new clinical practice has been introduced, adopted by more than half of the maternity wards in Sweden with the aim of reducing severe perineal trauma. This procedure involves two midwives assisting the woman during the second stage of labour. METHODS/

designIn this multicentre randomised controlled trial, 2946 women will be randomised to be assisted by one or two midwives during the second stage of labour. Women age 18-47, who plan for their first vaginal birth, with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation, will be asked to participate when admitted to the maternity ward. Five maternity wards comprising 19,500 births/year in different parts of Sweden will participate in this study. The sample size is powered to demonstrate a 50% reduction (from 4.1-2.0%) in primary outcome, which is the prevalence of severe perineal trauma (3rd and 4th degree). Secondary outcomes will include maternal and neonatal outcomes, women's experiences, midwives' experiences of the intervention, incontinence, and pelvic floor symptoms. The primary analysis is intention to treat. Questionnaires will be sent to the women at 1 month and 1 year after the birth to assess women's experiences, pain, incontinence, pelvic floor symptoms, sexual function, and mental health. DISCUSSION: It is important for care during labour and birth to be evidence based. There is a strong desire among midwives to reduce the risk of severe perineal trauma. This may lead to new strategies and practices being implemented into practice without scientific evidence. The intervention might have negative side effects or unintended consequences. On the other hand, there is a possibility of the intervention improving care for women. TRIAL REGISTRATION {2A}: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03770962 . Registered on 10 December 2018.

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricPerineumAdolescentAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicParturitionPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSwedenYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33225972
PMCPMC7682019
OpenAlexW3107698711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.