Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33225951›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Electives in the medical curriculum - an opportunity to achieve students' satisfaction?

Ana Rita Ramalho, P M Vieira-Marques, C Magalhães-Alves, M Severo, M A Ferreira, I Falcão-Pires

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development and Validation of Scale Regarding Perception of Elective Module Block-2 among Undergraduate Medical Students.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Rita RamalhoDepartment of Public Health and Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. anaritaramalho@chuc.min-saude.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7968-8706
P M Vieira-MarquesCINTESIS - Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems. Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
C Magalhães-AlvesCardiovascular Research and Development Center, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
M SeveroDepartment of Public Health and Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
M A FerreiraDepartment of Public Health and Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
I Falcão-PiresCardiovascular Research and Development Center, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectives are perceived by medical students as a valuable, highly regarded experience, allowing them to customize learning experiences and enabling them to early differentiate during medical training. The present work aims to uncover students' major determinants of satisfaction and how they interfere with their future elective choices in order to identify the best approach to implement electives in medical curricula.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted through a written evaluation survey concerning the electives available in the academic year 2015-2016. Our institution provides 106 electives to students from the 2

resultsQuantitative analysis of the questionnaires allowed to establish both: 1) The determinants of students' satisfaction with electives, which were Agreement with teaching and learning methodologies, followed by Agreement with assessment methodologies employed, Perception of the workload demanded and Requirement for continuous work and 2) The predictors of students preferences in the following years, namely, Agreement with assessment methodologies employed, Classes attendance and Ranking of the allocated elective established in the previous year. Qualitative analysis of questionnaires revealed that students consider electives as being innovative and interesting, claiming that some, for their relevant content, could be integrated into the medical core curriculum.

conclusionsOur work raises awareness on the best practices when it comes to electives' organization to meet students' satisfaction. We can conclude that medical schools should measure students satisfaction as a tool to organize and predict future needs of electives and placements when designing and implementing this alternative student-centred curriculum or even to improve the existing practices regarding electives in medical courses.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumHumansPersonal SatisfactionAlternative curriculaAssessmentElectiveSatisfactionTeaching and learningUndergraduate medical curriculumWorkload

Identifiers

PMID33225951
PMCPMC7681969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.