Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33225941›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

The impacts and unintended consequences of the nationwide pricing reform for drugs and medical services in the urban public hospitals in China.

Xiaoxi Zhang, Hongyu Lai, Lidan Zhang, Jiangjiang He, Bo Fu, Chunlin Jin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. New evidence on supplier-induced demand in China's public tertiary hospitals: is the cost of hospitalization higher in the off-season?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives in the United States and China: The Need for Professional Public Space.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoxi ZhangShanghai Health Development Research Center, 1477 Beijing West Rd., Shanghai, 200040, China.
Hongyu LaiSchool of Data Science, Fudan University, 220 Handan Rd, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Lidan ZhangSchool of Management, Fudan University, 220 Handan Rd, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Jiangjiang HeShanghai Health Development Research Center, 1477 Beijing West Rd., Shanghai, 200040, China.
Bo FuSchool of Data Science, Fudan University, 220 Handan Rd, Shanghai, 200433, China. fu@fudan.edu.cn.
Chunlin JinShanghai Health Development Research Center, 1477 Beijing West Rd., Shanghai, 200040, China.
Development Research Center · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

Key Programme 71991471Shanghai Municipal Health Commission 20194Y0310, 19Y04007Shanghai Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science 2019BGL030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 2015, China has been rolling out the pricing reform for drugs and medical services (PRDMS) in the urban public hospitals in order to reduce drug expenditures and to relieve financial burdens of patients. This study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of the reform and investigating its positive impacts and unintended consequences to provide evidence basis for further policy making.

methodsThe Difference-in-difference (DID) approach was employed to analyze the reform impacts on the 31 provincial administrative areas in China based on data abstracted from China Statistics Yearbooks and China Health Statistics Yearbooks from 2012 to 2018.

resultsThe reform resulted in a decrease of 7.59% in drug cost per outpatient visit, a decrease of 5.73% in drug cost per inpatient admission, a decrease of 3.63% in total cost per outpatient visit and an increase of 9.10% in surgery cost per inpatient admission in the intervention group. However, no significant change in examination cost was found. The reduction in the medical cost per inpatient admission was not yet demonstrated, nor was that in the total outpatient/ inpatient expenses. The nationwide pricing reform for drugs and medical services in urban public hospitals (PRDMS-U) in China is demonstrated to be effective in cutting down the drug expenditures. However, the revealed unintended consequences indicate that there are still significant challenges for the reform to reach its ultimate goal of curbing the medical expenditures.

conclusionWe conclude that the pricing reform alone may not be enough to change the profit-driven behavior of medical service providers as the root cause lies in the unchanged incentive scheme for providers in the service delivery. This holds lessons for policy making of other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with similar health systems set up in the achievement of Universal Health Coverage (UHC).

Indexed as

Health Care ReformChinaCosts and Cost AnalysisDelivery of Health CareDrug CostsHealth ExpendituresHealth PolicyHealth ServicesHospitals, PublicHumansPrescription DrugsPrescription DrugsChinaDifference-in-difference (DID)Pricing reform for drugs and medical services (PRDMS)Public hospitals

Identifiers

PMID33225941
PMCPMC7682084
OpenAlexW3107012681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.