Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33225925›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

Patterns of religiosity and spirituality of psychiatrists in Brazil and the implications for clinical practice: a latent profile analysis.

Maria Cecilia Menegatti-Chequini, Alexandre A Loch, Frederico C Leão, Mario F P Peres, Homero Vallada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria Cecilia Menegatti-ChequiniDepartment and Institute of Psychiatry (LIM-21, LIM-23 and ProSER), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, R. Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785, Zip Code 05403-010, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. mceciliamc@usp.br.ORCID 0000-0002-8958-983X
Alexandre A LochLaboratory of Neuroscience (LIM-27), Institute of Psyquiatry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Frederico C LeãoDepartment and Institute of Psychiatry (LIM-21, LIM-23 and ProSER), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, R. Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785, Zip Code 05403-010, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Mario F P PeresDepartment and Institute of Psychiatry (LIM-21, LIM-23 and ProSER), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, R. Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785, Zip Code 05403-010, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Homero ValladaDepartment and Institute of Psychiatry (LIM-21, LIM-23 and ProSER), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, R. Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785, Zip Code 05403-010, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough there is consensus, in psychiatry, over the inclusion of religious and spiritual aspects when evaluating and treating the patient, investigation of these dimensions is rare. There is evidence as to the relationship between psychiatrists' religious/spiritual beliefs and their willingness to discuss a patient's religion and spirituality (R/S). Due to the lack of information about how psychiatrists in Brazil deal with R/S in patient care, the aim of the present study is to analyze the religious/spiritual profile of these professionals and to ascertain its influence on attitudes and behavior in clinical practice.

methodsFive hundred and ninety-two psychiatrists from Brazil answered a questionnaire about R/S in clinical practice. The latent profile analysis was used to search for differences of religious/spiritual profiles. The ANOVA and Pearson's chi-square tests were employed to identify any correlation between clinical opinion and behaviors according to the different profiles.

resultsTwo religious/spiritual profiles were identified (entropy value > 0,96): the so called "less religious" group (n = 245), comprised predominantly by men, professionally more experienced, with a higher level of academic education (Master or PhD degrees) and were the ones who least enquired about their patients' R/S; and the "more religious" psychiatrists (n = 347) those who had higher consideration for R/S on health, and who more often addressed R/S with their patients and therefore usually ascribed importance to include R/S in their professional training.

conclusionThe latent profile analysis produced two distinct classes between the Brazilian psychiatrists according to their R/S views: the more religious professionals, who investigate the patient's R/S in a more detailed manner, and the less religious, who tend to disregard this aspect.

Indexed as

PsychiatrySpiritualityBrazilHumansMaleReligionSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical practiceLatent profile analysisPsychiatricsPsychiatryReligionSpirituality

Identifiers

PMID33225925
PMCPMC7682088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.