Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33225915›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2020

A RE-AIM evaluation of Healthy Together: a family-centred program to support children's healthy weights.

Joan L Bottorff, Anne Huisken, Michele Hopkins, Catherine Nesmith

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03550248 (Healthy Weights for Children Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03550248 nacompletednot on this map

Healthy Weights for Children Project (Phase 3)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2017 to 2020Enrolled3,400ConditionsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Overweight and ObesityArmsHealthy Together
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joan L BottorffInstitute for Healthy Living and Chronic Disease Prevention, University of British Columbia, 1147 Research Road, Art 223, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada. Joan.bottorff@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9724-5351
Anne HuiskenInstitute for Healthy Living and Chronic Disease Prevention, University of British Columbia, 1147 Research Road, Art 223, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.
Michele HopkinsThe Bridge Youth and Family Services, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Catherine NesmithThe Bridge Youth and Family Services, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Kelowna General Hospital · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Public Health Agency of Canada 1415-HQ-000818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthy Together (HT) is family-centered program to support healthy eating and physical activity designed for implementation in community organizations serving families who may be experiencing vulnerabilities (e.g., related to low income, isolation, ethnicity, immigrant/refugee status, and/or Indigenous background). The purpose of this study was to conduct an evaluation of HT in a real-world, scale-up phase using the RE-AIM framework.

methodsUsing a cross-sectional, non-comparative design, a community-based program evaluation was conducted in 29 organizations implementing HT as part of their core service programs. Data were collected using questionnaires with program participants and facilitators, and interviews with directors of participating organizations. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were content analyzed.

resultsWith regards to Reach, over 3400 caregivers, children and youth attended community programming that offered HT. Among those attending on the scheduled day for the evaluation, 663 completed the questionnaires. The majority of caregiver respondents (n = 431) were female (92%) and attended with children 0-6 years. Respondents also included children 4-6 years (n = 142) and 7-12 years (n = 65), and youth 13-18 years (n = 25). Effectiveness was demonstrated in reported improvements in physical activity, healthy eating, and strengthened social connections. HT was also widely supported by participants and facilitators. Adoption was influenced by the desire to enrich core service programs for families, HT's fit within existing programs, organizational commitment, and funding support. Implementation experiences indicated that fidelity to the HT program was generally maintained, with some setting specific adaptations. Maintenance of HT was influenced by financial and non-financial resources within community organizations. Most organizations also introduced new initiatives to extend support for healthy eating and physical activity.

conclusionOur findings indicate improvements in healthy eating and physical activity, and social connections among program participants, as well as efforts by community organizations to create environments to support healthy weights. HT was successfully delivered in "real-world" community settings across multiple contexts and with families with diverse backgrounds. This along with strategies to support program implementation and sustainability indicate that HT provides a model for other public health interventions to promote family health and wellbeing.

trial registrationClincialTrials.gov NCT03550248. Registered May 25, 2018.

Indexed as

Child HealthAdolescentAdultCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDiet, HealthyExerciseFamilyFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleFamily-focused interventionFamily healthHealth behaviorHealth promotionHealthy lifestylesHealthy weightsObesity preventionParentingPediatric obesityProgram evaluation

Identifiers

PMID33225915
PMCPMC7681950
OpenAlexW3107015978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.