Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33225907›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2020

Current status and future perspective of external herbal dispensaries preparing traditional herbal medicine in South Korea: the first National-Wide Survey results.

Soo-Hyun Sung, Ji-Eun Han, Ji-Yeon Ryu, Angela Dong-Min Sung, Jung-Youn Park, In-Hyuk Ha, Kyeong Han Kim, Jang-Kyung Park, Byung-Cheul Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Soo-Hyun SungDepartment of Policy Development, National Development Institute of Korean Medicine, Seoul, 04554, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Eun HanDepartment of Policy Development, National Development Institute of Korean Medicine, Seoul, 04554, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Yeon RyuDepartment of Policy Development, National Development Institute of Korean Medicine, Seoul, 04554, Republic of Korea.
Angela Dong-Min SungDepartment of Policy Development, National Development Institute of Korean Medicine, Seoul, 04554, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Youn ParkDepartment of Health and Welfare, Yuhan University, 590 Gyeongin-ro, Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 14780, Republic of Korea.
In-Hyuk HaJaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, 536 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06110, Republic of Korea.
Kyeong Han KimDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Woosuk University, Wanju, 55338, Republic of Korea.
Jang-Kyung ParkDivision of Clinical Medicine, School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Kyungnam, 50612, Republic of Korea.
Byung-Cheul ShinDivision of Clinical Medicine, School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Kyungnam, 50612, Republic of Korea. drshinbc@pusan.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0059-2689

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare noneNational Research Foundation of Korean Government 2014R1A5A2009936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn external herbal dispensary (EHD) is a type of pharmacy that provides various types of personalized herbal medicines (PHMs) to other traditional Korean medicine (TKM) institutions. Such dispensaries were legalized by the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MoHW) in 2008 in South Korea. The purpose of this study is to understand the current status of the EHD facilities and their quality controls and compare them with the good manufacture practice (GMP) guidelines to contribute to the establishment of the safety and quality control criteria for PHMs.

methodsWe contacted 107 EHD representatives or people in charge of the preparation of PHMs (TKM pharmacists) and invited them to complete a survey questionnaire; of the total, 81 responded. The survey questionnaire was developed in 3 stages: drafting, revision by external experts, and final editing. It consisted of 20 questions covering 3 sections: basic characteristics of EHDs, facility, and quality control. The survey was hosted online from December 2017 to January 2018 as guided by the MoHW.

resultsThe completion rate was 75.7% (n = 81). In terms of facilities, the five facilities (water supply, manufacture, pest control, hygiene management and warehousing) that corresponded to the legal requirements of EHD were mostly equipped, but the types of facilities and equipment differed. Two facilities (sterilization and cross-contamination that were not legally required for EHD were found to have mostly pharmacopuncture-EHD (P-EHD), but hardly any herbal medicine-EHD (H-EHD). In our findings regarding quality control of non-medicinal herbs, sensory evaluation that included checks for foreign bodies and deterioration were conducted. In terms of the quality control of herbal medicines, residual pesticides and heavy metals tests were performed and for pharmacopuncture, pH, salinity, sterility, and endotoxin tests along with gross examination were performed. In the end, we found that 6 of the 38 standard items as required by the Korea GMP were suitable.

conclusionsIn this study, detailed information for each existing EHD law was determined through a nationwide questionnaire. Moreover, the basis for its reflection in additional legal standards should be introduced so that safe herbal medicine can be prepared in EHDs.

Indexed as

Drug and Narcotic ControlHealth Services AccessibilityHerbal MedicineMedicine, Korean TraditionalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRepublic of KoreaSurveys and QuestionnairesExternal herbal dispensaryPersonalized herbal medicineQuality controlSouth KoreaSurveyTraditional Korean medicine

Identifiers

PMID33225907
PMCPMC7681953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.