Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33225811›Full record

ArticlePolicy, politics & nursing practice2021

Surveying Primary Care Nurse Practitioners: An Overview of National Sampling Frames.

Jordan M Harrison, Hayley D Germack, Lusine Poghosyan, Grant R Martsolf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Policy, politics & nursing practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Methods and lessons from conducting a national study of primary care nurse practitioners.Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jordan M HarrisonRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4932-8504
Hayley D GermackDepartment of Acute & Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0035-6301
Lusine PoghosyanColumbia University School of Nursing, New York City, New York, United States.
Grant R MartsolfRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1942-8683

Funding

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Chronic Disease Outcomes and Nurse Practitioner PracticeR01MD011514 · NIMHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI POGHOSYAN, LUSINE · 2017 to 2020
$3.0M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD011514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nurse practitioners (NPs) represent the fastest growing segment of the U.S. primary care workforce. Surveys of primary care NPs can help to better understand the care NPs deliver across different health care settings, the factors that impact NP job satisfaction and burnout, and the structural capabilities required to support their practice. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of national sampling frames that can be used by researchers interested in surveying or studying the U.S. primary care NP workforce. We conducted an environmental scan and review of published literature on the NP workforce to identify data sources that can be used to sample primary care NPs. In this article, we (a) identify the data elements needed to develop an NP sampling frame and (b) describe national data sets that can be used to sample primary care NPs, including the strengths and weaknesses of each. This information is intended to facilitate research on the primary care NP workforce to inform practice and policy.

Indexed as

Health WorkforceNurse PractitionersPrimary Health CareResearchData CollectionHumansSampling StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesnurse practitionersprimary health caresurveys and questionnairesworkforce

Identifiers

PMID33225811
PMCPMC9257230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.