Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33225464›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of paediatric dentistry2021

Randomised clinical study of plaque removal efficacy of an electric toothbrush in primary and mixed dentition.

Esti Davidovich, Renzo A Ccahuana-Vasquez, Hans Timm, Julie Grender, Avi Zini

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of paediatric dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05935254 (Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Efficacy of Electric Toothbrushes Between Children With Attention Deficit And Hyperactivity Disorder And Healthy Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05935254 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Evaluation of Plaque Removal Efficacy of Electric Toothbrushes Between Children With Attention Deficit And Hyperactivity Disorder And Healthy Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorAydin Adnan Menderes UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled52ConditionsAttention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder, Dental PlaqueArmsPlaque removal efficacy of children's electric toothbrush (Oral-B D100 Vitality, Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States), Plaque removal efficacy of children's soft manual toothbrush (Oral-B Stages 6-12 years, Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, United States)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Esti DavidovichFaculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University & Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0183-9337
Renzo A Ccahuana-VasquezProcter & Gamble Service GmbH, Kronberg, Germany.
Hans TimmProcter & Gamble Service GmbH, Kronberg, Germany.
Julie GrenderProcter & Gamble Company, Mason, OH, USA.
Avi ZiniFaculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University & Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILProcter & Gamble (Germany) · DEProcter & Gamble (United States) · US

Funding

Procter and Gamble
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical investigations of electric toothbrushes in young children are limited.

aimTo assess plaque reduction efficacy of an oscillating-rotating electric versus manual toothbrush in a paediatric population in primary and mixed dentitions.

designIn this randomised, single-brushing, 2-treatment, 4-period, replicate-use crossover study, subjects were divided into 2 age groups (3-6 years; 7-9 years) and assigned to a treatment sequence involving an Oral-B Kids electric brush and a manual brush control. Plaque was assessed pre- and post-brushing (Turesky Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index). Parents brushed the teeth of their children aged 3-6 years, whereas children aged 7-9 years brushed their own teeth under supervision. Plaque removal scores were analysed for brush differences in each age group separately using an analysis of covariance for crossover design.

resultsForty-one children (n = 20, 3-6 years; n = 21, 7-9 years) completed the study. For the primary dentition in children 3-6 years, the electric brush reduced 32.3% more plaque than the manual brush (P = .005). For the mixed dentition in children 7-9 years, the electric brush reduced 51.9% more plaque than the manual brush (P < .001).

conclusionsAn electric toothbrush reduced significantly more plaque than a manual toothbrush in 2 paediatric age groups.

Indexed as

Dental PlaqueDentition, MixedChildChild, PreschoolCross-Over StudiesDental Plaque IndexEquipment DesignHumansSingle-Blind MethodToothbrushingchildrenelectric toothbrushmanual toothbrushpaediatricplaque removal

Identifiers

PMID33225464
PMCPMC10015989
OpenAlexW3108002777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read27
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.