Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33225307›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2020

A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study of Tocilizumab in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Tyler C Lewis, Samrachana Adhikari, Vasishta Tatapudi, Meredith Holub, Dennis Kunichoff, Andrea B Troxel, Robert A Montgomery, Daniel H Sterman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in COVID-19 patients: a living systematic review and meta-analysis, first update.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tyler C LewisDepartment of Pharmacy, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Samrachana AdhikariNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Vasishta TatapudiTransplant Institute, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Meredith HolubDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Dennis KunichoffNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Andrea B TroxelNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Robert A MontgomeryTransplant Institute, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Daniel H StermanDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
New York University · USMiami Transplant Institute · USNYU Langone Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the impact of tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin 6 receptor, on survival in patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

designObservational cohort study of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 between March 1, 2020, and April 24, 2020. A propensity-matched (1:1) analysis was used to compare patients who received tocilizumab to controls who did not. Competing risk survival analysis was used to determine the primary outcome of time to mortality, and adjusted log-linear and logistic regression for secondary outcomes.

settingThree hospitals within the NYU Langone Health system in New York. PATIENTS: Consecutive adult patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019.

interventionTocilizumab 400-mg IV once in addition to standard of care or standard of care alone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsData from 3,580 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 positive qualifying hospitalized patients were included, of whom 497 (13.9%) were treated with tocilizumab. In the analysis of tocilizumab-treated patients and matched controls, fewer tocilizumab-treated patients died (145/497, 29.2%) than did controls (211/497, 42.4%). In the adjusted competing risk regression model, tocilizumab therapy was associated with improved survival relative to controls (hazard ratio = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.18-0.33,

conclusionsTocilizumab therapy was associated with significantly improved survival in coronavirus disease 2019 patients. This survival benefit was associated with increased ICU length of stay and increased infection rate, even as more patients in the tocilizumab group were rescued from rapid death. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial is needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

coronavirus disease 2019hyperinflammationinterleukin 6respiratory failuresurvivaltocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID33225307
PMCPMC7671881
OpenAlexW3100292257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.