Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33225196›Full record

ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2020

Polite Speech Emerges From Competing Social Goals.

Erica J Yoon, Michael Henry Tessler, Noah D Goodman, Michael C Frank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Quantifying Epistemic Relevance.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Relevant answers to polar questions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Teachers recruit mentalizing regions to represent learners' beliefs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Active Iterative Social Inference in Multi-Trial Signaling Games.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2023
    Article
  9. Great ape communication as contextual social inference: a computational modelling perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. A Pragmatic Account of the Weak Evidence Effect.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Polite Speech Emerges From Competing Social Goals.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erica J YoonDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7895-6390
Michael Henry TesslerDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.
Noah D GoodmanDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.
Michael C FrankDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language is a remarkably efficient tool for transmitting information. Yet human speakers make statements that are inefficient, imprecise, or even contrary to their own beliefs, all in the service of being polite. What rational machinery underlies polite language use? Here, we show that polite speech emerges from the competition of three communicative goals: to convey information, to be kind, and to present oneself in a good light. We formalize this goal tradeoff using a probabilistic model of utterance production, which predicts human utterance choices in socially sensitive situations with high quantitative accuracy, and we show that our full model is superior to its variants with subsets of the three goals. This utility-theoretic approach to speech acts takes a step toward explaining the richness and subtlety of social language use.

Indexed as

communicative goalscomputational modelingpolitenesspragmatics

Identifiers

PMID33225196
PMCPMC7672308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.