Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33225075›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction open2020

L Devenutto, R Quintana, T Quintana

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Trends and Hotspots in Premature Ovarian Insufficiency Therapy from 2000 to 2022.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L DevenuttoReproductive Medicine Service, "Procrearte", Institution Affiliated with the University of Buenos Aires (UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-5745-4941
R QuintanaReproductive Medicine Service, "Procrearte", Institution Affiliated with the University of Buenos Aires (UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-2265-9071
T QuintanaReproductive Medicine Service, "Procrearte", Institution Affiliated with the University of Buenos Aires (UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Universidad de Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary ovarian insufficiency (POI) and diminished ovarian reserve are two conditions that affect women's fertility. Oocyte donation remains an option for these patients; however, the development of certain novel technologies, such as OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: Here, we review the main pathways (PI3K and Hippo signaling) that govern the activation of primordial follicles and its application through the development of culture systems that support ovarian cortex for autologous transplantation. We also review the available data from case reports regarding outcomes of pregnancy and live birth rates with IVA. SEARCH

methodsA PubMed search was conducted using the PubMed-NCBI database to identify literature pertinent to the pathways involved in the activation of primordial follicles and the outcomes of IVA techniques from 2013 to the present. OUTCOMES: Women with POI have around a 5% chance of spontaneous pregnancy. Recently, novel techniques involving the activation of primordial follicles through molecular pathways have been developed, thus increasing the odds of these patients. More recently, the introduction of a drug-free IVA technique has shown to increase the number of antral follicles with successful oocyte maturation after gonadotropin treatment, reaching pregnancy rates over 30%, either through spontaneous conception or by the implementation of assisted reproductive technology. LIMITATIONS: The evidence of this review is based on a few small series, so data should be interpreted with caution, and only randomized controlled trials could estimate the real magnitude and success of the procedure. REASONS FOR CAUTION: IVA technique remains an experimental strategy, with limited available data and the requirement of invasive procedures. Moreover, possible carcinogenic effects not yet determined after transplantation require special caution. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: In view of the results achieved, IVA could provide a promising option for the preservation of fertility in some cancer patients and prepuberal girls where the only alternative is tissue cryopreservation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The authors received no specific funding for this work and declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Indexed as

invitro activation/ primary ovarian insufficiency/ diminished ovarian reserve/ 38 PI3K pathway/ Hippo pathway/ dormant primordial follicle/ growth factors/ 39 autotransplantation

Identifiers

PMID33225075
PMCPMC7668396
OpenAlexW3102737598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.