Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33225070›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2020

New non-invasive device to promote primary closure of the fascia and prevent loss of domain in the open abdomen: a pilot study.

Joao Baptista Rezende-Neto, Bruna Gewehr Camilotti

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06242925 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of a Non-invasive Device in the Management of Open Abdomen (AbCLO)- Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorTufts Medical CenterRan2024 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsOpen AbdomenArmsAbCLO (Abdominal Wall Closure) Device
NCT07154589 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of AbClo Fascial Approximation Device in Patients With Open Abdomen on Respiratory Mechanics (AbClo-Resp)

TypeobservationalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2025 to 2026Enrolled18ConditionsOpen Abdomen, Mechanical Ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joao Baptista Rezende-NetoSurgery, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bruna Gewehr CamilottiGeneral Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary closure of the fascia at the conclusion of a stage laparotomy can be a challenging task. Current techniques to medialize the fascial edges in open abdomens entail several trips to the operating room and could result in fascial damage. We conducted a pilot study to investigate a novel non-invasive device for gradual reapproximation of the abdominal wall fascia in the open abdomen.

methodsMechanically ventilated patients ≥16 years of age with the abdominal fascia deliberately left open after a midline laparotomy for trauma and acute care surgery were randomized into two groups. Control group patients underwent standard care with negative pressure therapy only. Device group patients were treated with negative pressure therapy in conjunction with the new device for fascial reapproximation. Exclusion criteria: pregnancy, traumatic hernias, pre-existing ventral hernias, burns, and body mass index ≥40 kg/m

resultsThirty-eight patients were investigated, 20 in the device group and 18 in the control group. Primary closure of the fascia by direct suture without mesh or component separation was achieved in 17 patients (85%) in the device group and only 10 patients (55.6%) in the control group (p=0.0457). Device group patients were 53% more likely to experience primary fascial closure by direct suture than control group patients. Device group showed gradual reduction (p<0.005) in the size of the fascial defects; not seen in control group. There were no complications related to the device.

conclusionsThe new device applied externally on the abdominal wall promoted reapproximation of the fascia in the midline, preserved the integrity of the fascia, and improved primary fascial closure rate compared with negative pressure therapy system only. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

abdomenabdominal injuriesrandomized controlled trialwound closure techniques

Identifiers

PMID33225070
PMCPMC7661352
OpenAlexW3100521317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.