Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33225043›Full record

ArticleRegenerative engineering and translational medicine2019

The role of preservation in the variability of regenerative medicine products.

Guanglin Yu, Allison Hubel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative engineering and translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guanglin YuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Allison HubelDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Multicomponent solutions for the preservation of cell therapy productsR01EB023880 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HUBEL, ALLISON · 2017 to 2019
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regenerative medicine (RM) has the potential to restore or establish normal function of cells, tissues and organs that have been lost due to age, disease or injury. It is common for the site of raw material collection, site of manufacture and site of clinical use to be different for RM products, and at the same time cells must remain viable and functional during transportation among different sites. Freezing products down to cryogenic temperatures along with cold chain transportation has become an effective method of preserving RM products. The quality of RM products along this supply chain represents the cumulative effects of all of the processing steps and all of the reagents used in the process. A variety of sources of variability in the preservation of RM products can result in both cell losses and greater variability in the quality of RM products. The purpose of this article is to review the sources of variability in the preservation process as well as the methods by which variability can be controlled or avoided.

Indexed as

cryopreservationregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID33225043
PMCPMC7677879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.