Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33225024›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2020

Lung radiofrequency ablation: post-procedure imaging patterns and late follow-up.

Jose de Arimateia Batista Araujo-Filho, Raonne Souza Almeida Alves Menezes, Natally Horvat, Pedro Sergio Brito Panizza, João Paulo Giacomini Bernardes, Rodrigo Sanford Damasceno, Brunna Clemente Oliveira, Marcos Roberto Menezes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Expert Consensus for Thermal Ablation of Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules (2021 Edition)].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jose de Arimateia Batista Araujo-FilhoRadiology Department, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Adma Jafet 91, São Paulo, SP, 01308-050, Brazil.
Raonne Souza Almeida Alves MenezesRadiology Department, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Adma Jafet 91, São Paulo, SP, 01308-050, Brazil.
Natally HorvatRadiology Department, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Adma Jafet 91, São Paulo, SP, 01308-050, Brazil.
Pedro Sergio Brito PanizzaRadiology Department, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Adma Jafet 91, São Paulo, SP, 01308-050, Brazil.
João Paulo Giacomini BernardesRadiology Department, Hospital Sírio-Libanês Brasília - Centro De Oncologia Asa Sul, SGAS 613/614 Conjunto E Lote 95 - Asa Sul, Brasília, DF, 70200-730, Brazil.
Rodrigo Sanford DamascenoRadiology Department, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Adma Jafet 91, São Paulo, SP, 01308-050, Brazil.
Brunna Clemente OliveiraRadiology Department, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Adma Jafet 91, São Paulo, SP, 01308-050, Brazil.
Marcos Roberto MenezesRadiology Department, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Adma Jafet 91, São Paulo, SP, 01308-050, Brazil.
Hospital Sírio-Libanês · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe expected imaging features on chest computed tomography (CT) after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of lung tumors, and their frequency over time after the procedure.

methodsIn this double-center retrospective study, we reviewed CT scans from patients who underwent RFA for primary or secondary lung tumors. Patients with partial ablation or tumor recurrence during the imaging follow-up were not included. The imaging features were assessed in pre-defined time points: immediate post-procedure, ≤4 weeks, 5-24 weeks, 25-52 weeks and ≥52 weeks. Late follow-up (3 and 5 years after procedure) was assessed clinically in 48 patients.

resultsThe study population consisted of 69 patients and 144 pulmonary tumors. Six out of 69 (9%) patients had primary lung nodules (stage I) and 63/69 (91 %) had metastatic pulmonary nodules. In a patient-level analysis, immediately after lung RFA, the most common CT features were ground glass opacities (66/69, 96 %), consolidation (56/69, 81 %), and hyperdensity within the nodule (47/69, 68 %). Less than 4 weeks, ground glass opacities (including reversed halo sign) was demonstrated in 20/22 (91 %) patients, while consolidation and pleural thickening were detected in 17/22 patients (77 %). Cavitation, pneumatocele, pneumothorax and pleural effusions were less common features. From 5 weeks onwards, the most common imaging features were parenchymal bands.

conclusionsOur study demonstrated the expected CT features after lung RFA, a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for selected patients with primary and secondary lung tumors. Diagnostic and interventional radiologists should be familiar with the expected imaging features immediately after RFA and their change over time in order to avoid misinterpretation and inadequate treatments.

Indexed as

Ablation techniquesCT, Computed tomographyDiagnostic imagingHU, Hounsfield unitsLung neoplasmsMultidetector computed tomographyPET-CT, Positron emission tomography – computed tomographyRFA, Radiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID33225024
PMCPMC7666375
OpenAlexW3104144597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.