ArticleBioMed research international2020
An Innovative Immune Score-Based Prognostic Nomogram for Patients with Cervical Cancer.
Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Progress of the application clinical prediction model in polycystic ovary syndrome.Journal of ovarian research · 2023Pooled it
- Metabolic and endometrial ultrasonographic factors associated with clinical pregnancy in PCOS patients undergoing FET: a nomogram development study with internal validation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Immune-Inhibitory Gene Expression is Positively Correlated with Overall Immune Activity and Predicts Increased Survival Probability of Cervical and Head and Neck Cancer Patients.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the past few years, the immune system and tumor immune microenvironment are becoming increasingly popular as more work has been accomplished in this field. However, nomograms based on immune-related characteristics for prognosis prediction of cervical cancer have not been fully explored to our knowledge. We constructed a novel immune score-based nomogram to predict patients with high risk and poor prognosis. MATERIALS AND
methods198 patients with cervical cancer from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were included in our study. Immune scores were generated with Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in MAlignant Tumor tissues using Expression data (ESTIMATE) algorithm, and clinic-pathological characteristics were also included for subsequent analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed for univariate and multivariate analyses to screen the significant factors, and a prognostic nomogram was built. Bootstrap resampling analysis was used for internal validation. The calibration curve and concordance index (C-index) were used to assess the predictive performance of the nomogram.
resultsPatients were split into three subgroups based on immune scores. We found that patients with high immune scores conferred significantly better overall survival (OS) compared with those with medium and low immune scores (hazard ratio (HR), 0.305; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.108-0.869). A nomogram with a C-index of 0.720 had a favorable performance for predicting survival rate for clinical use by combining immune scores with other clinical features. The calibration curves at 3 and 5 years suggested a good consistency between the predicted OS and the actual OS probability.
conclusionsOur work highlights the potential clinical application significance of immune score-based nomogram in predicting the OS of cervical cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.