Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33224954›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2020

Dietary Energy Modulation and Autophagy: Exploiting Metabolic Vulnerabilities to Starve Cancer.

Alyssa J Cozzo, Michael F Coleman, Jane B Pearce, Alexander J Pfeil, Suhas K Etigunta, Stephen D Hursting

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alyssa J CozzoDepartment of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Michael F ColemanDepartment of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Jane B PearceDepartment of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Alexander J PfeilDepartment of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Suhas K EtiguntaDepartment of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Stephen D HurstingDepartment of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Higher Dietary Carbohydrates Detrimentally Impact Obesity-Associated Breast Cancer ChemoresistanceR35CA197627 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HURSTING, STEPHEN D · 2015 to 2021
$6.0M
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer cells experience unique and dynamic shifts in their metabolic function in order to survive, proliferate, and evade growth inhibition in the resource-scarce tumor microenvironment. Therefore, identification of pharmacological agents with potential to reprogram cancer cell metabolism may improve clinical outcomes in cancer therapy. Cancer cells also often exhibit an increased dependence on the process known as autophagy, both for baseline survival and as a response to stressors such as chemotherapy or a decline in nutrient availability. There is evidence to suggest that this increased dependence on autophagy in cancer cells may be exploitable clinically by combining autophagy modulators with existing chemotherapies. In light of the increased metabolic rate in cancer cells, interest is growing in approaches aimed at "starving" cancer through dietary and pharmacologic interventions that reduce availability of nutrients and pro-growth hormonal signals known to promote cancer progression. Several dietary approaches, including chronic calorie restriction and multiple forms of fasting, have been investigated for their potential anti-cancer benefits, yielding promising results in animal models. Induction of autophagy in response to dietary energy restriction may underlie some of the observed benefit. However, while interventions based on dietary energy restriction have demonstrated safety in clinical trials, uncertainty remains regarding translation to humans as well as feasibility of achieving compliance due to the potential discomfort and weight loss that accompanies dietary restriction. Further induction of autophagy through dietary or pharmacologic metabolic reprogramming interventions may enhance the efficacy of autophagy inhibition in the context of adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Nonetheless, it remains unclear whether therapeutic agents aimed at autophagy induction, autophagy inhibition, or both are a viable therapeutic strategy for improving cancer outcomes. This review discusses the literature available for the therapeutic potential of these approaches.

Indexed as

autophagycaloric restrictioncancercancer therapyfastingmetabolism

Identifiers

PMID33224954
PMCPMC7674637
OpenAlexW3096384214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.