Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33224940›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

No Tangible Effects of Field-Grown Cisgenic Potatoes on Soil Microbial Communities.

Sascha M B Krause, Astrid Näther, Vilma Ortiz Cortes, Ewen Mullins, Geert J T Kessel, Lambertus A P Lotz, Christoph C Tebbe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Sascha M B KrauseThünen Institute of Biodiversity, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries, Braunschweig, Germany.
Astrid NätherThünen Institute of Biodiversity, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries, Braunschweig, Germany.
Vilma Ortiz CortesTeagasc Crops, Environmental and Land Use Program, Crop Science Department, Oak Park Crops Research Centre, Carlow, Ireland.
Ewen MullinsTeagasc Crops, Environmental and Land Use Program, Crop Science Department, Oak Park Crops Research Centre, Carlow, Ireland.
Geert J T KesselPlant Research International, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Lambertus A P LotzPlant Research International, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Christoph C TebbeThünen Institute of Biodiversity, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries, Braunschweig, Germany.
Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut · DETeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEWageningen University & Research · NLEast China Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA modification techniques are increasingly applied to improve the agronomic performance of crops worldwide. Before cultivation and marketing, the environmental risks of such modified varieties must be assessed. This includes an understanding of their effects on soil microorganisms and associated ecosystem services. This study analyzed the impact of a cisgenic modification of the potato variety Desirée to enhance resistance against the late blight-causing fungus

Indexed as

16S rRNA geneenvironmental risk assessmentfield trialfungal ITS sequencegenetically modified plantsnitrite reductase genes (nirS) (nirK)potato rhizospheresoil DNA analyses

Identifiers

PMID33224940
PMCPMC7670967
OpenAlexW3095872447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.