Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33224926›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Biotechnology and Biomaterial-Based Therapeutic Strategies for Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Part I: Biomaterials-Based Drug Delivery Devices.

Nahla Jemni-Damer, Atocha Guedan-Duran, María Fuentes-Andion, Nora Serrano-Bengoechea, Nuria Alfageme-Lopez, Felix Armada-Maresca, Gustavo V Guinea, José Pérez-Rigueiro, Francisco Rojo, Daniel Gonzalez-Nieto and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Medication Trends for Age-Related Macular Degeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Nahla Jemni-DamerNeuro-Computing and Neuro-Robotics Research Group, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Atocha Guedan-DuranNeuro-Computing and Neuro-Robotics Research Group, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
María Fuentes-AndionNeuro-Computing and Neuro-Robotics Research Group, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Nora Serrano-BengoecheaNeuro-Computing and Neuro-Robotics Research Group, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Nuria Alfageme-LopezNeuro-Computing and Neuro-Robotics Research Group, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Felix Armada-MarescaOphthalmology Service, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Gustavo V GuineaSilk Biomed SL, Madrid, Spain.
José Pérez-RigueiroSilk Biomed SL, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco RojoSilk Biomed SL, Madrid, Spain.
Daniel Gonzalez-NietoSilk Biomed SL, Madrid, Spain.
David L KaplanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States.
Fivos PanetsosNeuro-Computing and Neuro-Robotics Research Group, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESBiomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine · ESTufts University · USHospital Universitario La Paz · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ESUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid · ES

Funding

Translational Bioreactors - Engineering Complex TissuesP41EB002520 · NIBIB · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2004 to 2018
$16.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) is an up-to-date untreatable chronic neurodegenerative eye disease of multifactorial origin, and the main causes of blindness in over 65 years old people. It is characterized by a slow progression and the presence of a multitude of factors, highlighting those related to diet, genetic heritage and environmental conditions, present throughout each of the stages of the illness. Current therapeutic approaches, mainly consisting of intraocular drug delivery, are only used for symptoms relief and/or to decelerate the progression of the disease. Furthermore, they are overly simplistic and ignore the complexity of the disease and the enormous differences in the symptomatology between patients. Due to the wide impact of the AMD and the up-to-date absence of clinical solutions, the development of biomaterials-based approaches for a personalized and controlled delivery of therapeutic drugs and biomolecules represents the main challenge for the defeat of this neurodegenerative disease. Here we present a critical review of the available and under development AMD therapeutic approaches, from a biomaterials and biotechnological point of view. We highlight benefits and limitations and we forecast forthcoming alternatives based on novel biomaterials and biotechnology methods. In the first part we expose the physiological and clinical aspects of the disease, focusing on the multiple factors that give origin to the disorder and highlighting the contribution of these factors to the triggering of each step of the disease. Then we analyze available and under development biomaterials-based drug-delivery devices (DDD), taking into account the anatomical and functional characteristics of the healthy and ill retinal tissue.

Indexed as

biomaterialsBruch’s membranenanocarriersneuroprotectionocular drug deliveryretinaretinal pigment epitheliumVEGF

Identifiers

PMID33224926
PMCPMC7670958
OpenAlexW3096174972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.