ReviewGland surgery2020
Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance: Asian
Review in Gland surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting malignancy in thyroid AUS: ultrasonographic and clinical risk factors beyond ACR TI-RADS.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Risk of malignancy and necessity of completion thyroidectomy in patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules (Bethesda III and IV), more than expected in endemic region.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- A targeted proteomics assay for the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Welcoming the new, revisiting the old: a brief glance at cytopathology reporting systems for lung, pancreas, and thyroid.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2024Review
- The Asian Thyroid Working Group, from 2017 to 2023.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2023Review
- Molecular Testing for Thyroid Nodules: The Experience at McGill University Teaching Hospitals in Canada.Cancers · 2022Review
- Hashimoto's Thyroiditis Does Not Influence the Malignancy Risk in Nodules of Category III in the Bethesda System.Cancers · 2022Article
- The Risk Stratification of Papillary Thyroid Cancer With Bethesda Category III (Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance) by Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Could Be Assisted by Tumor Size for Precision Treatment.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Article
- Comparison of Korean vs. American Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Malignancy Risk Assessment of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2021Article
- Inter- and Intra-observer Reproducibility of Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology: An investigation of Bethesda 2023 Using Immunohistochemical BRAFV600E Antibody.Journal of cytologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has paved the way for comparisons of the practice of thyroid cytology in many different regions. However, there have been comparatively few studies documenting differences between Asian and non-Asian practice. Here, we aim to compare a few key parameters between the two regions, focusing on the indeterminate category of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS). We compared its incidence, resection rates (RRs), risk of malignancy (ROM), rate of repeat fine needle aspiration (rFNA), ROMs of cytomorphologic subcategories of nuclear atypia (AUS-N)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.