ReviewGland surgery2020
An overview of thyroid fine-needle aspiration practice in Myanmar.
Review in Gland surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conventional ultrasonography and elastosonography in diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- The Asian Thyroid Working Group, from 2017 to 2023.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2023Review
- Does ultrasonic elastography show high sensitivity in diagnosing benign and malignant thyroid nodules?Gland surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the thyroid is a widely accepted method for aiding the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. In Myanmar, it has been done since the early 1990s, and mainly performed by surgeons and otorhinolaryngologists. The interpretation of cytology is solely made by pathologists. Although some of the experts particularly those from specialist hospitals use the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC), many still prefer the British five-tier cytopathology report. Available local publications addressing the accuracy of FNAC and cytologic-histologic correlations were queried. Ten studies performed in 1991-2018 on 540 thyroid nodules were included. Cytologic-histologic correlations showed a range of sensitivity from 64.29% to 100%, specificity from 93% to 100%, and diagnostic accuracy from 94% to 100%. The adoption of TBSRTC by pathologists is still slow and should be encouraged via seminars and training programs. Further multihospital-based large cohort studies with uniform design and adequate follow-up are needed to better promote and assess utility of thyroid FNAC in Myanmar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.