Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33224843›Full record

ReviewGland surgery2020

The Japanese reporting system for thyroid aspiration cytology 2019 (JRSTAC2019).

Mitsuyoshi Hirokawa, Ayana Suzuki, Miyoko Higuchi, Toshitetsu Hayashi, Seiji Kuma, Yasuhiro Ito, Akira Miyauchi

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Thyroid cytology: practical tricks and pitfalls.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Recent topics on thyroid cytopathology: reporting systems and ancillary studies.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Thyroid nodules: diagnosis and management.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Asian Thyroid Working Group, from 2017 to 2023.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mitsuyoshi HirokawaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology, Kuma Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Ayana SuzukiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology, Kuma Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Miyoko HiguchiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology, Kuma Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Toshitetsu HayashiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology, Kuma Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Seiji KumaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology, Kuma Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Yasuhiro ItoDepartment of Surgery, Kuma Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Akira MiyauchiDepartment of Surgery, Kuma Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Kuma Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce the Japanese reporting system for thyroid aspiration cytology 2019 (JRSTAC2019) proposed by the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Pathology. Pathological classification and recommended clinical management for thyroid nodules in Japan are different from those described in the World Health Organization classification or the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). Therefore, it was necessary to develop a reporting system adapted for Japan. JRSTAC2019 is a modified version of TBSRTC. Currently, JRSTAC2019 is widely used in Japan, although the details of the system have not been introduced in English. JRSTAC2019 comprises seven categories: (I) unsatisfactory, (II) cyst fluid, (III) benign, (IV) undetermined significance, (V) follicular neoplasm (FN), (VI) suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and (VII) malignant. "Cyst fluid" nodules are classified as an independent category, and "recommended management" is in the same category as "benign" nodules. Surgical resection for FN nodules is decided upon by considering several parameters, and the decision is made without performing gene analysis. Non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features tends to be more often diagnosed as papillary carcinoma. The risk of malignancy of SFM in Japan is higher than that in Western countries, and resection rates of SFM and malignant tumors are lower owing to active surveillance for low-risk papillary microcarcinoma. We recommend that each country should develop its reporting system, suitable for its medical and social needs. However, it should be easily compatible with TBSRTC for the ease of academic data sharing.

Indexed as

Bethesda systemcyst fluidfine-needle aspiration cytologyreporting systemthyroid

Identifiers

PMID33224843
PMCPMC7667058
OpenAlexW3088915131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.