Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33224842›Full record

ReviewGland surgery2020

Litigation in thyroid cytology and histopathology in England: a very brief overview.

David N Poller

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Asian Thyroid Working Group, from 2017 to 2023.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David N PollerDepartment of Pathology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Cosham, Portsmouth, UK.
Queen Alexandra Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This brief review discusses legal issues in thyroid cytology and histopathology in England. The principal risks in thyroid cyto/histopathology are either underdiagnosis of a malignant condition as benign, overdiagnosis of a benign condition as malignant, or the failure to recognise or the overdiagnosis as malignant of a benign or inflammatory condition. There are multiple diagnostic pitfalls in both cytology and histopathology and these are reasonably well documented. The interobserver reproducibility as assessed by kappa statistics of some of the major criteria for malignancy, specifically papillary-type nuclei in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma, capsular invasion or vascular invasion are comparatively poor hence diagnoses of well differentiated papillary or follicular carcinoma may often be to some extent subjective. This article reviews the current legal situation in England discussing recent legal case precedents with a suggestion for improving communication and the preoperative consent process for patients.

Indexed as

clinical negligencecytologyerrorhistopathologyThyroid

Identifiers

PMID33224842
PMCPMC7667078
OpenAlexW3013510502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.