Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33224829›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2020

Impact of intraoperative radiotherapy on the perioperative period of patients after breast-conserving surgery.

Xiaowu Hu, Yong He, Xinxin Chen, Ting Xia, Tengfei Cao, Haixia Jia, Lehong Zhang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04789889 (Comparison of Satisfaction With Conserved Breast, Postoperative Complications and Tumor Control Between IORT and Postoperative Radiotherapy in Breast Conserving Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04789889 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Satisfaction With Conserved Breast, Postoperative Complications and Tumor Control Between IORT and Postoperative Radiotherapy in Breast Conserving Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorXiangyun ZongRan2021 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsQuality of LifeArmsintraoperative radiotherapy, postoperative radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaowu HuDepartment of Breast Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yong HeDepartment of Radiotherapy, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinxin ChenDepartment of Breast Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ting XiaDepartment of Breast Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tengfei CaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Haixia JiaDepartment of Breast Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lehong ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate the effect of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in the perioperative period of patients after breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

methodsThe clinical data of 100 patients with early breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by treatment with IORT using the Intrabeam system (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Oberkochen, Germany) (BCS + IORT group, n=100) between June 2016 and December 2019 were analyzed and compared with the data of 60 matched patients who only underwent breast-conserving therapy over the same period (BCS group, n=60). The surgical settings and postoperative acute complications between the groups were assessed.

resultsThere was no significant statistical difference between the groups in terms of age, tumor size, grading, lymph node status, hormone receptor status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status (P>0.05). The BCS + IORT group had a significantly longer surgery duration (P<0.05), but there was no significant statistical difference in terms of intraoperative blood loss, amount of bleeding, drainage tube removal time, postoperative length of hospitalization, incision suture removal time, or incidence of postoperative complications (P>0.05).

conclusionsIORT using the Intrabeam system safely delivers radiation therapy, is well-tolerated, has acceptable acute toxicity, and does not significant increase the risk of surgery or the incidence of perioperative complications.

Indexed as

breast-conserving surgery (BCS)Early breast cancerIntrabeam systemintraoperative radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33224829
PMCPMC7667061
OpenAlexW3093196291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.