ArticleGland surgery2020
Clinical and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with different chemotherapy regimens predicts the outcome of locally advanced breast cancer.
Article in Gland surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Retrospective analysis of the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy albumin paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A real-world study of the effectiveness and safety of apatinib-based regimens in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Breast-Conserving Surgery in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis retrospective analysis was designed to research whether clinical response partial response (PR)/complete response (CR) and pathological response (PCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy can translate into prognosis benefit pathological response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and whether different chemotherapy regimens will influence the outcomes.
methodsOne hundred and thirty-five patients with breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in the retrospective analysis. Patients were followed up strictly. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The comparison of the clinical and pathological characteristics and recurrence was performed using the carried out by chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by the Cox regression analysis.
resultsClinical response was strongly correlated with lymph nodes status (P=0.032). The OS comparison of pathological response between the pCR group and non-pCR groups did not exhibit statistically significant differences (P=0.400). A similar non-significant response result was observed in the comparison of clinical response between the PR/CR and SD/PD groups group (P=0.108). Univariate and multivariate analyses did not support clinical response (P=0.156 P=0.095 respectively) or pathological response (P=0.600 P=0.144 respectively) as the predictors of prognosis. There were no significant differences in either the comparison of the clinical response group it seems no statistically significance (P=0.496) or the comparison of the pathological response group (P=0.460). OS analyses across different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens demonstrated no significant differences (P=0.307). In the PR/CR and PD/SD comparison of every single regimen, there were no significant differences. However, for patients with PR/CR patients from the comparison of five regimens, namely, TAC, FAC, AC-T, AT and TCBP demonstrated a significant difference (P=0.022). In the group of patients with luminal A breast cancer, the result of the Fisher's exact test approached significant (P=0.059).
conclusionsNeither PR/CR nor pCR can translate into long-term outcome benefit. PR/CR and PCR are not independent predictors in patients with advanced breast cancer. Patients who received a taxane + anthracycline regimen exhibited a higher recurrence rate than any other regimens, especially those patients with luminal A breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.