ArticleGland surgery2020
Value of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in non-palpable suspicious calcifications: an eight-year single institution experience with 587 patients.
Article in Gland surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mammogram geometric projection localization (MaGPL) for surgical body-surface localization of nonpalpable breast calcifications.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Visualization positioning-guided biopsy of suspicious breast microcalcifications: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) has been routinely recommended for stereotactic intervention in cases of isolate mammographically-detected calcifications. Herein we aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic consistency and accuracy of calcified and noncalcified specimens obtained from same sites of sampling on mammography-visible calcifications. In addition, we presented the biopsy procedure and retrospectively evaluated the usefulness of VABB as well as the complications of this technique over an eight-year experience in our centre.
methodsThis single-institution observational cohort study included 587 patients referred for stereotactic 11-gauge VABB of 594 mammographically-detected calcifications between January 2010 and December 2018. The rate of histopathological underestimation, the false negative, the diagnostic consistency and accuracy between calcified and noncalcified specimens of VABB were comprehensively evaluated based on the surveillance data and final histopathological result of the surgical specimens.
resultsIn total, 594 biopsy procedures were performed in 587 patients (mean age 46 years, range, 21-80 years). The average number of biopsy specimens was 14.7 (range, 9-21) per lesion. VABB pathological results revealed 471 (79.3%) benign, 39 (6.6%) high-risk, and 84 (14.1%) malignant cases. The diagnostic inconsistency between calcified and noncalcified specimens was 14.6% (105/123) for high-risk and malignant lesions. Furthermore, calcified specimens exhibited higher diagnostic accuracy of malignant lesion as compared with the noncalcified specimens (97.7% versus 82.6%, respectively). Underestimation rate for high-risk lesions and
conclusionsStereotactic 11G-VABB might be preferred for the investigation of non-palpable mammographically-detected calcifications in terms of accuracy and safety profile. The high prevalence of diagnostic discordance between the specimens with and without calcifications revealed a higher value of calcified specimens in diagnosing high-risk and malignant calcifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.