ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2020
When to use intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography during percutaneous coronary intervention?
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review on the Use of Intravascular Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography During Femoropopliteal Endovascular Intervention.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025Pooled it
- Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Plaque Characterization: Clinical Implications, Evidence Gaps, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- OCT for Optimizing Long-Term Clinical Results in Left Main PCI-Dream or Reality? Results from a Single-Center High-Volume Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography: Lumen Size and Plaque Morphology.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Microcosting analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention with and without intracoronary imaging in an Irish tertiary referral centre.Open heart · 2025Article
- Characteristics of calcified nodule attributable to culprit lesion in acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.iScience · 2024Article
- In-Stent Restenosis Overview: From Intravascular Imaging to Optimal Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Multimodal imaging approach for the diagnosis of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD): Basic principles, current and future perspectives.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024Review
- Management of Calcified Coronary Lesions.US cardiology · 2024Review
- Article
- Consensus of the National Heart Center in collaboration With the Saudi Arabian Cardiac Interventional Society on the Clinical Use of Intracoronary Imaging.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2024Article
- Review
- Niche preclinical and clinical applications of photoacoustic imaging with endogenous contrast.Photoacoustics · 2023Review
- Review
- [Acute coronary syndrome provoked by a coronary intramural hematoma].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023Article
- Optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2022Review
- Ten things to know about ten imaging studies: A preventive cardiology perspective ("ASPC top ten imaging").American journal of preventive cardiology · 2021Review
- Design of the LUDICO study: effectiveness and safety of coronary laser in undilatable or uncrossable lesions.REC, interventional cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) are intravascular imaging technologies widely used in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The impact of these modalities for optimizing the acute and longer-term clinical impact following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is supported by a wealth of clinical evidence. Intravascular imaging provides unique information for enhanced lesion preparation, optimal stent sizing, recognizing post PCI complications, and the etiology of stent failure. This review compares and contrasts the key aspects of these imaging modalities during PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.