ArticleMethodsX2020
The social versus food preference test: A behavioral paradigm for studying competing motivated behaviors in rodents.
Article in MethodsX, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal dimensioning of grid-connected PV/wind hybrid renewable energy systems with battery and supercapacitor storage a statistical validation of meta-heuristic algorithm performance.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Altered Neural Activity in the Mesoaccumbens Pathway Underlies Impaired Social Reward Processing in Shank3-Deficient Rats.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- The effects of social loss and isolation on partner odor investigation and dopamine and oxytocin receptor expression in female prairie voles.Neuropharmacology · 2025Article
- Cortical and subcortical activities during food rewards versus social interaction in rats.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Partner-seeking and limbic dopamine system are enhanced following social loss in male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).Genes, brain, and behavior · 2023Article
- Designing animal-friendly behavioral tests for neuroscience research: The importance of an ethological approach.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Recent advancements in behavioral testing in rodents.MethodsX · 2021Article
- Wistar rats and C57BL/6 mice differ in their motivation to seek social interaction versus food in the Social versus Food Preference Test.Physiology & behavior · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Behavior is influenced by a combination of factors, with the expression of the appropriate behavior dependent on an individual's current motivational state and the presence of stimuli in their surrounding environment. Thus far, most laboratory studies have focused on uncovering the peripheral and central systems that regulate the expression of a single behavior or the expression of a suite of behaviors associated with a single motivational state. In natural settings, however, an individual can be simultaneously experiencing multiple motivational states with multiple choices of how to act. Yet, the direct assessment of the roles of peripheral and central systems in coordinating motivated behavioral choice is largely understudied. This may be due to a lack of behavioral tests that are suitable for such investigations. Here, we describe a recently developed behavioral paradigm, hereafter called the Social versus Food Preference Test. This behavioral paradigm was validated in both rats and mice and is highly flexible, which will allow addressing of a wide range of research questions concerning the peripheral and central systems that coordinate the choice to seek social interaction versus the choice to seek food.•This paradigm was validated in rats and mice, the two most commonly used nonhuman species in behavioral research, but could be adapted for use in other rodent models.•The specific social and food stimuli used can be selected based on the research question.•Three-chamber apparatuses can be custom-constructed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.